Produkt nyheder

Canon EOS R6 Mark III preview

Nyt fra dpreview - 6 nov 2025 - 07:00

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission. Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. Product Photos: Mitchell Clark

The Canon EOS R6 III is an enthusiast-class camera with a new 32MP full-frame CMOS sensor, aimed at photographers and videographers who need high burst rates and fast readout speeds.

Key specifications

32MP full-frame CMOS sensor
Built-in image stabilization rated to 8.5EV
40fps burst rate w/ pre-capture
3.0", 1.62M dot fully-articulating screen
7K recording up to 60p (Canon Cinema Raw Lite)
Oversampled 4K <60p, 4K 120p
3:2 Open Gate recording up to 30p

The Canon EOS R6 III will be available from late November at a recommended price of $2799, a $300 premium over the Mark II's launch price. The EOS R6 II will formally drop to a $2299 price point. There'll also be a variant costing $100 more, designed to work with the professional stop-motion software, Dragonframe.

The EOS R6 III will be available as a kit with the RF 24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM for around $3150 and with the RF 24-105mm F4.0 L IS USM for $4050.

Index:

Buy now:

Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo What's new? New sensor

The 33MP FSI CMOS sensor at the heart of the EOS R6 III is a new one for Canon's hybrid mirrorless lineup, having only appeared recently in the cinema-focused EOS C50. Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. As usual for Canon, it has a dual pixel design with two sub-pixels at each location, one capturing the left half of the image, the other capturing the right, allowing the entire sensor to be used for phase detection AF.

The faster readout speeds, paired with changes to the card slot and processor (Canon says it's the same generation, but has some improvements) allow for big improvements to video capture. The stabilization system has also gotten a bit of a bump, going from 8EV to 8.5EV.

Updated ports

The EOS R6 III replaces one of its predecessor's dual UHS-II SD card slots with a CFexpress Type B one. While you can still use most of the camera's features with an SD card, you will need to use the faster, larger and more expensive storage to record Raw video.

Speaking of video, the EOS R6 II's microHDMI port is no more on the EOS R6 III. In its place is a full-size one, which is much more appropriate on a camera destined to be many people's workhorse.

Better burst

Despite having the same rates, the EOS R6 III improves on its predecessor's burst rates, no longer requiring a special Raw Burst mode to enable pre-burst capture. Instead, there's now a pre-continuous shooting option that you can simply enable when in the H+ drive mode. Canon says this is largely thanks to that CFexpress card slot and its faster write speeds.

Raw Burst mode is no longer on the camera, though it's hard to be sad about that. While there were benefits to Raw Burst mode, such as it displaying bursts as a single thumbnail in the playback menu, it was overall a relatively clunky experience. To edit the photos you took outside of Canon's own software, you had to select the individual frames you want, and save them as a standard .CR3 Raw files, JPEGs, HEIFs or combinations thereof. That extra step is no longer necessary.

Canon also now says the shutter has been durability tested to 500,000 actuations. We're not used to Canon explicitly giving a figure for a camera at this level.

Raw, 7K and open-gate video

The Canon EOS R6 III gains the ability to record Raw video internally at up to 7K/60 in Canon's proprietary Canon Cinema Raw format. It can also now shoot 'open-gate' video at up to 7K/30, recording the entire area of the sensor to produce a 3:2 image that you can take vertical and landscape crops from.

The menus for selecting your recording mode have also been updated. The EOS R6 II presented you with an overwhelming list containing each possible combination of resolution, frame rate and compression settings, but the EOS R6 III thankfully lets you choose these all independently.

The EOS R6 III also now gains a dedicated red tally lamp, making it obvious to both you and your on-screen talent when you're recording.

AF Upgrades

Looking at the autofocus system, it seems largely the same as the one in the EOS R6 II, with subject recognition support for people, animals and vehicles, as well as an auto mode. However, Canon says the algorithms underpinning those modes have been updated to match the ones on cameras like the EOS R1 and EOS R5 II, making it even more reliable.

The EOS R6 III also gains the Register People Priority feature, where you can train it to recognize a specific person and principally focus on tracking them over other people that may be in the scene.

While the cameras theoretically have 'Digic X' processors, Canon says it's made intergenerational improvements to the chip that allow for some of the EOS R6 III's new features.

What is it? The EOS R6 III is part of the class of "do anything" hybrid cameras.

The EOS R6 III is Canon's enthusiast-tier full-frame camera, which means it's designed to excel at pretty much whatever you want to shoot with it. Like the rest of the cameras in this class (and its predecessor), it's capable enough for most kinds of photography, from landscape shooting to fast-paced action and sports, and comes equipped with the kinds of video features you would've had to buy a cinema camera to get just a few years ago. It also has weather sealing and dual card slots.

Of course, there are some things that separate it from the even higher-end Stacked sensor cameras like Canon's own EOS R5 II. It misses out on a bit of extra resolution and a few features that pros might want, such as the ability to control the focus point with your eye, in-camera 'AI' upscaling and Action Priority modes. Canon says the latter two require a still-expensive co-processor that just wasn't in the budget for this camera, but it should still easily handle whatever tasks enthusiasts throw at it.

It can shoot at a 40fps burst rate for up to 150 seconds in Raw and JPEG, and supports pre-burst capture, which can help if you're just a bit too slow to the shutter. You no longer have to use the somewhat clunky Raw burst mode to access these features, like you did with the EOS R6 II.

The EOS R6 III's Register People Priority supports up to ten faces, and will prioritize them according to your set order.

Canon has included its now-standard autofocus system, which has subject recognition for people, animals and vehicles, as well as an auto mode that searches for those within the scene. It also supports registering a specific person and having the camera prioritize them when choosing which subject to focus on.

It also supports HDR output, with its ability to produce 10-bit HEIF stills with the PQ tone curve, in place of JPEGs. While PQ isn't as broadly supported as the HLG curve used by other companies like Nikon and Panasonic, it can, at least, simultaneously record both HEIF and Raws, unlike Sony, which makes you choose between Raw capture and HDR output files. When shooting video, it can capture HDR video footage using either PQ or HLG. The latter is more widely supported when it comes to playback and is a new addition compared to the EOS R6 II.

Speaking of video, the EOS R6 III is well-equipped for motion pictures too. It supports internal Raw recording, a false color overlay to help you nail exposure and the >4K open gate capture gives you greater flexibility in post.

The EOS R6 III in context

The EOS R6 III is launching into a market segment with robust competition. Its predecessor was still quite a sensible option, so we've included it in the comparison, alongside the Nikon Z6III, which offers a similar combination of fast shooting, top-tier autofocus and incredible video specs. We're also comparing the Sony a7 IV, as its 33MP sensor makes it an obvious competitor, even if it can't match the speed of the other cameras on this list.

Canon EOS R6 III Canon EOS R6 II Nikon Z6III Sony a7 IV MSRP (US / UK) $2800 / £2800 $2300 / £2200 $2700 / £2500 $2700 / £2400 Sensor type Dual Pixel AF FSI CMOS Dual Pixel AF FSI CMOS 'Partially stacked' CMOS BSI CMOS Resolution 33MP 24MP 24MP 33MP Maximum shooting rate 12fps mech.
40fps e-shutter 12fps mech.
40fps e-shutter 14fps mech.
20fps e-shutter
60fps JPEG-only 10fps lossy Raw Pre-burst capture? Yes Yes (Raw Burst mode) Yes (JPEG only) No Image stabilization 8.5EV 8EV 8EV 5.5EV Stills rolling shutter rate (ms) ∼13.5ms (12-bit) ∼14.7ms (12-bit) ∼14.6ms (14-bit) ∼67.6ms (14-bit) Flash sync speed 1/250 sec 1/250 sec 1/200 sec 1/250 sec AF subject detection Human
Animal (Dog / Cat / Bird / Horse)
Vehicle (car, motorcycle, plane, train)
Automatic Human
Animal (Dog / Cat / Bird / Horse)
Vehicle (car, motorcycle, plane, train)
Automatic Human
Dog/Cat
Bird
Plane
Car
Motorcycle / Bike
Train
Automatic Human
Animal
Bird HDR still output PQ HEIF PQ HEIF HLG HEIF HLG HEIF (no Raw) Video resolutions 7K DCI/60 (Raw)
7K/30 open-gate
4K/120 (full-width)
1080p/180 (full-width)

4K/60 (full-width, oversampled from 6K)
1080p/180 (full-width)

6K/60 (Raw)
5.4K/60 (full-width)
UHD 4K/60 (full-width)
UHD 4K/120 (1.5x crop)

UHD 4K/30 (full-width)
UHD 4K/60 (1.5x crop)

Uncompressed video C-Raw 6K over HDMI N-Raw
ProRes RAW Over HDMI Video assist tools False color overlay
Waveform
Log view assists False color overlay
Log view assist Waveform
Log view assist
Shutter angle Log view assist Viewfinder res/ magnification/
eyepoint 3.69M dot
0.76x
23mm 3.69M dot
0.76x
23mm 5.76M dot
0.8x
21mm 3.69M dot
0.78x
23mm Rear screen 3.0"
1.62M dot
Fully-articulating 3.0"
1.62M dot
Fully-articulating 3.2"
2.1M dot
Fully-articulating 3.0"
1.03M dot
Fully-articulating Media types 1x CFexpress Type B
1x UHS-II SD 2x UHS-II SD 1x CFexpress Type B
1x UHS-II SD 1x Combo CFexpress Type A / UHS-II SD
1x UHS-II SD Battery life EVF / LCD 270 / 510 320 / 580 360 / 390 520 / 580 Dimensions 138 x 98 x 88mm
(5.5 x 3.9 x 3.5") 138 x 98 x 88mm
(5.5 x 3.9 x 3.5") 139 x 102 x 74mm
(5.5 x 4 x 3")

131 x 96 x 80mm
(5.3 x 3.8 x 3.1")

Weight 699g
(25.7oz) 680g
(24.0oz) 670g
(23.6oz) 658g
(23.2oz)

The Z6III's partially Stacked sensor has higher read noise than other designs, which gives it a disadvantage when raising the shadows (though, importantly, this has no impact on the midtones). We'll have to wait until we get a production EOS R6 III to see how it performs in this regard. In both cases, it's worth checking to make sure whether the lenses you want exist before choosing a system, as both companies place restrictions on third-party lens makers.

While the a7 IV is still a quite capable camera, it's starting to look a little dated compared to the competition. Its rolling shutter performance when shooting full-width video is noticeably bad, it doesn't offer internal Raw video (though it's not an essential feature for most users), and while its autofocus is extremely capable, it's no longer the best that Sony offers. While Sony does allow third-party lenses on E-mount, buyers should be aware that it limits non-Sony lenses to 15fps (not that this is a problem for the a7 IV, with its 10fps max burst rate).

Body and Handling

The EOS R6 III hews close to Canon's tried-and-true design formula, and its body is very similar – though not exactly the same – as the EOS R6 II. It has a hefty grip that fits well in your hand, even with a heavier lens attached. It has an array of customizable buttons – nine in total – which can have different functions depending on whether you're in stills or video mode. Switching between the two modes is handled by a dedicated lever to the left of the EVF.

The autofocus joystick and surrounding buttons are placed within easy reach of where your thumb naturally falls when you're holding the camera, and are grouped in ways that helps you tell which one you're pressing by feel, even when your eye is up to the EVF.

Screen and viewfinder

The viewfinder and LCD have been unchanged from the EOS R6 II, though that's not really a complaint. The rear 3.0" screen is fully-articulated, which will be welcome to those using the camera for video. It's relatively bright, but can be a little difficult to see in extremely bright sunlight.

The viewfinder is large and can refresh at up to 120fps for a very responsive preview. It's not the highest resolution model out there, though, and it can't quite manage to show you a proper HDR preview when you're shooting in PQ mode, though it does have Canon's OVF simulation mode that gives you a better idea of how much dynamic range you're capturing, at the cost of truly previewing your exposure.

There's no discernible viewfinder blackout when shooting in at the highest burst rate settings using the electronic viewfinder, though it'll show up when shooting in lower burst rates or with the mechanical shutter.

Ports

The EOS R6 III has all the connectivity you might expect from this class of camera: USB C, headphone and microphone sockets, a multi-function hotshoe, 2.5mm remote terminal and full-size HDMI port. The latter represents a bit upgrade from the less-reliable and robust microHDMI port found on the EOS R6 II.

It has two card slots: one CFexpress Type B, and one UHS-II SD. You'll have to use the former if you want to record Raw video internally.

Battery

The EOS R6 III uses 16Wh LP-E6P battery, to give battery life ratings of 270 shots per charge via the viewfinder and 510 if you use the rear screen. These numbers jump to 390 and 620, respectively, if you engage power saving mode. As always, the CIPA-defined tests tend to under-represent how many images you can actually get, with double the rated figure not being unusual, but they're useful to compare between cameras. These are reasonable but not great for a camera likely to be used quite heavily by an enthusiast photographer.

The camera will still work with older batteries such as the LP-E6NH, though it warns that not all features will be available, and that some accessories won't work. Most notably, the camera loses support for network connectivity, refusing to connect to your smartphone or other devices.

Video The EOS R6 III has all the video assist tools most shooters will need: proxies, waveform and false color, dual-level zebras and Log/HDR view assist.

The EOS R6 III The highlights are its ability to record 7K open-gate footage at up to 30p, and support for oversampled 4K footage at up to 60p. It also lets you record in Canon's C-Log 2 or 3 response curves, and now has a button that defaults to opening the Color menu, making it a bit easier to switch between Log and non-Log recording.

It provides both DCI and UHD 4K options, though, humorously, the true 24fps mode is only available when recording DCI. Its Raw mode also lacks a 16:9 mode, but can record open-gate at up to 30p, from which you can take a UHD crop.

Its autofocus options remain the same throughout its recording modes; you still get continuous autofocus with subject recognition even when recording 4K/120 and 1080p/180. This is true both in the standard video recording mode and in the Slow-and-Fast mode that doesn't record audio and produces a file that plays back at a slower framerate.

Recording modes

While the EOS R6 III shares a sensor with the fan-cooled EOS C50, Canon includes several more options on its more cinema-focused camera. As an example, the EOS R6 III doesn't have an HQ Raw mode, nor does it support crop modes in Raw. It can, however, still record proxy files to its SD card slot, which could be quite useful when shooting Raw video.

Dimensions Rates Raw 1.89:1 7K 6960 x 3672 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98 ST (up to 30p), LT DCI 4K 4096 x 2160 120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98 – DCI 2K 2048 x 1080 180*, 150*, 120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98 – 16:9 modes UHD 4K 3840 x 2160 120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98 – Full HD 1920 x 1080 180*, 150*, 120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98 – 3:2 Open gate 7K Raw 6960 x 4640 30, 25, 24, 23.98 ST, LT 7K Compressed 6912 x 4608 30, 25, 24, 23.98 – * - with a 1.13x crop

Both the 4K and Full HD modes can be used in the "Fine" oversampling modes at all but their highest frame rates; the former from 7K capture, and the latter from 3.5K capture. However, Canon does note that, while the 4K/60 Fine mode is still oversampled, it won't have the same image quality that you get from the 4K/30 and slower modes.

Rolling shutter

The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter rates across its full-width recording modes, achieving excellent readout speeds in pretty much every mode we tested (though we haven't been able to measure the Raw modes yet, as we aren't able to decode the footage). Using the oversampled "fine" setting will roughly double the readout speeds over the standard ones, suggesting the standard mode is skipping half the lines, but they're still quick enough that fine mode should be usable in almost any scenario.

Rolling shutter 7K open gate 17.9ms 4K24/60 standard 7.2ms 4K24/60 "fine" 14.3ms

The only mode we'd advise any caution around is its 7K open gate setting. 17.9ms is still very fast, and will improve if you take a landscape crop of the frame, but if you're showing the full frame a little artifacting may start to creep in if you're capturing very fast pans or subjects.

Temperature limits

Unlike the video-focused EOS C50, the EOS R6 III is not fan-cooled. Canon has given the following figures for continuous recording times at 23°C (73°F). Taking shorter clips with some rest time between them is likely to give much longer durations.

Continuous recording times (approx.) Auto Off Temp: Std Auto Off Temp: High Raw 7K/60 23 min 23 min DCI 4K/120 28 min 35min DCI 4K/60 Fine (oversampled) 23 min 23 min Open gate 7K/30 (MP4) 24 min 36 min

The subsampled 4K/60 modes along with both subsampled and oversampled 'Fine' 4K modes at 30p and slower have no temperature restrictions. It's worth being aware of these limits if and when you use the camera's more ambitious modes.

Workflow

Canon includes a variety of tools to help making shooting video and, in particular, nailing exposure, easier. The EOS R6 III has options for both waveform monitoring, which provides more detail about what parts of your image are clipping than a traditional histogram, and a false color overlay, which makes it easier to tell if your skin tones are properly exposed.

It's also now much easier to set your white balance in video mode; you can capture it from the live view, rather than having to set it from a still image on the card (a process that, on other Canon cameras, meant switching into stills mode, taking a picture of your gray card, then switching back into the video mode before diving back into the settings). Speaking of live view, the camera also provides access to level gauges and magnification while recording, so you can make sure your horizon is perfect and your subject is in focus while you're rolling.

The EOS R6 III lets you upload LUTs into the camera, so you can preview an effect you wish to apply, but you can't bake the result into your footage. The EOS R6 III can output lower-resolution proxy files to an SD card while you capture your main footage to the CFexpress card. The only exception is Open gate shooting, where you can capture a proxy alongside Raw shooting but not if you're using MP4 as your main output.

One feature Canon's retained for its cinema cameras is shutter angle, which derives the shutter speed from the recording framerate, rather than an absolute setting. This means you don't have to adjust your shutter speed after changing frame rates to retain the same level of motion blur. It's a setting that most of the EOS R6 III's competitors, such as the Nikon Z6III and Panasonic S1II, have, but that it lacks.

Initial Impressions

By Mitchell Clark

Is it weird to say that the EOS R6 III is kind of surprising? Not the mere fact of its existence, of course; the enthusiast full-frame camera is the market's bread-and-butter, so Canon updating its model makes sense. But it feels like the kind of upgrade you'd see from a company trying to claw customers away from competitors, not one already at the top of the market.

The EOS R6 II, which Canon says will remain in its lineup for at least the medium term, is still a very competitive camera. Not only does it earn second place in our under $2500 buying guide, but Canon tells us it's the top-selling full-frame camera on the market, from any brand. It feels like Canon could've just made a few small improvements and called it a day, and if you just glance at the spec sheet or list of new features, you might get the impression that it has. But the changes it's made are ones that really matter, especially when it comes to competing with the other cameras in this class.

It feels like Canon looked at what other companies were doing, and said "okay, us too, but better."

Essentially, it feels like Canon looked at what the other companies were doing, and said "okay, us too, but better." Sony's shooting 33MP? The EOS R6 III does too, but with the blistering speeds of the lower-res Nikon Z6III and Panasonic S1II, so you no longer have to pick between higher resolution and being able to shoot faster than 10fps. Those two cameras also offer Raw video, another spec the EOS R6 III has caught up on. And for good measure, Canon threw in full-width 4K 120p for the people who like slow-mo, and open gate recording, since Panasonic shooters are so keen on it.

With every Canon release, there are people quick to point out how it's segmenting the market; what features does it lack that higher-end models do? Of course, there are features the much more expensive EOS R5 II has that this doesn't, but they're ones we're told have hardware costs and that, frankly, most people won't find themselves missing. If there are features Canon cut to make its more expensive models more appealing, they aren't obvious to me.

Canon says this camera is still squarely aimed at stills shooters, albeit ones who also need to be able to shoot video, so we're definitely looking forward to getting our hands on a production model to see if the ultra-fast sensor comes with any image quality impact, as was the case with the Nikon Z6III's 'partially Stacked' sensor. Even if there is, though, we're clearly well into the evolution of Canon's 6-series line; in the DSLR days, the EOS 6D was a decent camera, but one with obvious compromises relative to higher-end models. With the EOS R6 III, those compromises are getting much harder to find.

Buy now:

Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo Sample Gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

Kategorier: Produkt nyheder

OM System OM-5 II review

Nyt fra dpreview - 29 okt 2025 - 15:24

The OM System OM-5 II is a Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera that uses the same stabilized 20MP sensor as its predecessor. It also features the same processor as the OM-5, so the list of new features is relatively subtle, but it gains some minor updates that make it feel a bit more modern.

Key Specifications

20MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
50MP handheld high-res multi-shot mode
Up to 7.5EV stabilization with Sync IS lenses
Up to 30fps continuous shooting, configurable pre-capture
2.36M-dot 0.68x OLED viewfinder
IP53 dust and water resistance rating
USB-C for charging / data transfer
Updated menu system

The OM-5 II retails for $1199 body-only, the same as its predecessor, and is available now. It comes in black, silver and a "sand beige" tan.

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.com Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo Index:

What's New USB-C

When the OM-5 launched in 2022, its use of a micro USB port instead of a USB-C one felt like a huge omission, especially given that the European Union was already well on its way to mandating the more modern charging and communication standard. Thankfully, the OM-5 II doesn't repeat that mistake; it uses USB-C for charging and connecting to your computer, where it retains the ability to act as a webcam without any additional software or drivers via the UVC/UAC protocol.

This is mostly an upgrade to the charging experience. You'll still want to use an SD card reader for offloading photos, as the type C port still runs at USB 2.0, less than a tenth the speed of the 5Gbps "SuperSpeed" ports found on a majority of modern cameras.

Updated grip

While the OM-5 II's design is mostly unchanged from its predecessor's, OM System has made the grip a touch larger to help with ergonomics. Compared to the OM-5's, it fills out your hand just a bit more, which helps make it a touch more comfortable and easier to handle.

New menus The OM-5 II's menus, like those on the rest of the company's modern cameras, now look and work a lot like Canon's.

OM System has also brought over its updated menu system from the OM-1 and OM-3, with color-coded sections and tabs. Unlike its predecessor, the camera will try to give you an explanation for why certain items are unavailable instead of leaving you to guess what you need to change to access those features.

You can navigate through the sections using the front dial and switch pages using the rear one, which can be very quick once you get the hang of it. The four-way controller is required for changing your settings; you can use the touchscreen to switch tabs and sections, but not to navigate through or adjust the settings themselves.

CP button

OM System has replaced the OM-5's exposure compensation button with the 'CP' button that debuted on the OM-3. It gives you quick access to the camera's myriad computational photography modes; giving it a single press will activate your last-used mode, and if you press and hold it, you can use either command dial to scroll through the various modes and select the one you'd like to use.

The OM-5 II doesn't gain any new computational features compared to its predecessor, which is a bit of a shame since we've found the Live Graduated ND feature included in the higher-end models to be useful in some situations (though that may only be possible because of those cameras' Stacked sensors, which capture images faster, with less risk of rolling shutter). However, the OM-5 II still has a suite of useful computational modes:

OM-5 II OM-1 (II) / OM-3 Multi-shot high-res 50MP handheld / 80MP tripod 50MP handheld / 80MP tripod Live ND 1-4EV 1-6EV / 1-7EV for OM-1 II Live graduated ND — 1-3EV Focus stacking Yes, with select lenses Yes, with select lenses HDR Yes Yes Multiple exposure Yes Yes Live Bulb Yes Yes

All the multi-shot modes are processed in-camera, making them much more convenient to use compared to similar modes from other brands that have to be stitched with desktop software. However, that can take a while for some modes; the most taxing are the handheld high-res shots, which lock up the camera for over 15 seconds; even the progress bar won't move from the EVF to the display or vice versa if you move your eye to or away from the camera.

New color modes Standard Color Profile OM Cinema 1 OM Cinema 2

The OM-5 II includes the two video-only "OM Cinema" color modes from the OM-3, which are made to capture the same level of highlight information as the Log mode but without the extremely low-contrast, low-saturation logic that requires grading. The company says the OM Cinema 1 mode is designed to highlight yellows in the bright parts of your image and blues in the darker areas, while Cinema 2 adds a bit of cyan to the highlights and shadows while lowering contrast.

Like Log mode, these modes capture the additional highlight information by using a minimum ISO of 400, meaning they're designed to receive one stop less exposure than standard mode.

Light, camera, action

Speaking of video, the OM-5 II now features a red LED in the top right corner on the front of the camera, which acts as a tally light to make it obvious when you're recording video.

A little help

The OM-5 II adds two new assistance features: a 'Night Vision' mode that boosts the live view's brightness, making it easier to focus and/or compose in dark environments and a 'Handheld Assist' mode that shows you how stable you're keeping the camera during long exposures. It gives you a target that shows how much you've moved the camera since you started taking the picture. It makes it easier to tell whether your photo will come out blurry since you'll know whether you've moved more than the stabilization system can compensate for.

How it compares

The OM-5 II is mainly focused on people looking to capture their outdoor adventures, a niche that's often serviced by action video cameras. However, there's nothing about its design that precludes it from being a general-use stills camera. As such, we're comparing it to several comparably-priced APS-C cameras that are good for photos (no EVF-less, e-shutter only, single-dial cameras here) but that still include some decent video specs.

OM System OM-5 II Canon EOS R10 Fujifilm X-S20 Nikon Z50II MSRP $1199 $979 $1499 $909 Pixel Count / Sensor Size (Crop Factor) 20MP
Four Thirds (2.0x) 24MP
APS-C (1.6x) 26MP
APS-C (1.5x) 21MP
APS-C (1.5x) Image Stabilization 6.5EV
Up to 7.5EV w/ lens coordination Lens only Up to 7.0EV Lens only Max frame rate 6fps mech*
10fps elec with C-AF
30fps elec w/ focus and exposure lock 15fps mech
23fps elec 8fps mech
20fps elec
30fps w/1.25x crop 11fps mech
15fps elec
30fps JPEG-only Pre-burst recording? Yes Yes (Raw Burst mode) Yes Yes, JPEG-only Built-in flash? No Yes Yes Yes Weather sealing IP53 water/dust resistant certified No No Yes AF subject detection types Human / Eye Human / Eye
Animals
Vehicles Human / Eye
Animal
Bird
Cars
Motorcycle / Bike
Airplane
Train Auto
Human / Eye
Animal
Bird
Cars
Motorcycle / Bike
Airplane
Train 10-bit HDR Stills No PQ HEIF No HLG HEIF Viewfinder res. / mag. 2.36M dot
0.68x

2.36M dot
0.59x 2.36M dot
0.62x

2.36M dot
0.68x

Rear screen res. / type

3" 1.04M dot
Fully-articulating 3" 1.04M dot
Fully-articulating 3" 1.84M dot
Fully-articulating 3.2" 1.04M dot
Fully-articulating AF selection Touchscreen / 4-way controller Touchscreen / joystick Touchscreen / joystick Touchscreen / 4-way controller

Video

Full-width UHD/DCI 4K <30p UHD 4K 60p w/ 1.56x crop
Full-width UHD 4K <30p

Up to 6.2K/30p 3:2 (open gate)
UHD/DCI 4K 60p w/ 1.18x crop
Full-width UHD/DCI <30p

UHD 4K 60p w/ 1.5x crop
Full-width UHD 4K <30p 10-bit options No HDR PQ F-Log/F-Log 2
HLG

N-Log
HLG

Mic / headphone sockets? Yes / No Yes / No Yes / Yes Yes / Yes CIPA Battery rating (LCD/EVF) 310 / – 430 / 260 750 / 750 230 / 220 Weight 418g (14.7oz) 429g (15.1oz) 491g (17.3oz) 550g (19oz) Dimensions 125 x 85 x 52mm
(4.9 x 3.3 x 2.0") 123 x 88 x 83mm
(4.8 x 3.5 x 3.3") 128 x 85 x 65mm
(5.0 x 3.3 x 2.6") 127 x 97 x 67mm
(5 x 3.9 x 2.7")

* - the original OM-5 could shoot at 10fps mechanical, but not with continuous autofocus.

In some ways, OM System sets itself apart by offering features you'd usually need to pay more for, such as a stabilized sensor and weather sealing. You have to jump up to at least $1499 and the Fujifilm X-S20 to get them in an APS-C camera, and OM System is one of only two camera companies to offer a specific IP rating rather than a vague claim of "weather resistance." The other being Leica.

Like Fujifilm, there's a wide array of sensible lenses available you can pair with the OM-5 II, though Micro Four Thirds offers lighter and more compact options than even APS-C. It also offers an unusually high number of multi-shot modes with in-camera processing, that can boost its performance.

However, the OM-5 II misses out on some features that are quickly becoming table stakes, such as the ability to shoot 10-bit video or stills for playback on HDR displays, a 60p video mode, and a wider array of AI-derived subject detection modes for its autofocus system. At this point, there are cameras well under $1000 that have these features, so they feel like notable absences.

Body and Handling

Like its predecessor, the OM-5 II is very light, while still managing to remain well-balanced when paired with larger lenses like OM System's 40-150mm F4 Pro. The extra grip helps in this regard, filling out your palm and making the camera feel more substantial without adding much weight or bulk.

The OM-5 II has a selection of buttons and levers, and as is tradition for the brand, most of them can be customized to do pretty much anything you'd like. While the buttons around the four-way controller are fixed, you're free to do what you wish with the buttons on the top plate, including the two semi-circular ones atop the power lever. The settings are separate for stills and video modes.

It also has OM System's customary function lever, which is unfortunately much more limited; it can only be used to power the camera on or off (leaving the dedicated power lever to do nothing), turn the camera into video mode, or to switch between a small subset of dial functions or autofocus settings. It does not recognize the eye recognition mode, so you can't use it to switch between, say, tracking autofocus and continuous autofocus with eye recognition – unlike many other cameras, you can't have both human detection and the general tracking mode on at once.

It also features a locking mode dial, with settings for all the major exposure modes, along with video, scene and art filter modes. Its two top-plate command dials have relatively aggressive knurling, making them easy to manipulate even while wearing gloves.

Despite the revised menus, one of the OM-5 II's best features remains its "Super Control Panel," which is mapped to the OK button by default. It lets you easily access and control most of the camera's main shooting settings on a single touchscreen panel: drive mode, AF mode, face and eye detection, exposure and ISO control, etc. You can just tap on the screen and spin a command dial to change all the camera's key settings.

EVF and Monitor

The OM-5 II's viewfinder remains unchanged from the 2.36M dot 0.68x (equiv.) magnification model found on its predecessor. While it's relatively small, it usually gets the job done, and it's good to have in bright conditions where the fully articulating 3" LCD – also unchanged – will get washed out.

Battery The OM-5's tripod mount is somewhat controversial, and OM System tells us it's unchanged for the II.

The OM-5 II uses the same 8.5Wh BLS-50 battery as its predecessor, which the company says will last for around 310 shots based on CIPA test standards. While you can generally expect to get more shots than the rated number in real-world use, it's a useful indicator for comparing across cameras. In this case, it's relatively low; if you're going into the wilderness for a weekend, you may want to pack a spare battery or plan on topping it up with your USB-C power bank.

Image Quality

The handheld high-res multi-shot mode is easier to access than ever on this camera, and can be used to gain a bump in image quality. But it only works with very still subjects, and is slow to process.

OM-5 II | OM System 25mm F1.8 II | F5.6 | 1/500 sec | ISO 200
Photo: Mitchell Clark

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors, and detail types you'll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes, full even light and low directional light, to see the effect of different lighting conditions.

Image ComparisonThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

To start by answering the obvious question: there are no discernible differences between the output of the OM-5 and the OM-5 II that couldn't be explained by run-to-run variation; the two cameras perform virtually identically in our tests.

That's not necessarily a bad thing, as the original provided solid image quality. At base ISO, the OM-5 II's Raws have good levels of detail, roughly in line with what the Canon EOS R10 and Nikon Z50II capture, and slightly more than the Fujifilm X-S20 (though that may come down more to the difficulty some programs have with processing pictures taken using Fujifilm's X-Trans color filter). Given its smaller sensor, it's unsurprising that it has more noise across the tonal range than its APS-C competitors.

This also translates to worse low-light performance, though the images from the OM-5 II are still usable at mid-range ISOs and its stabilized sensor will let you shoot at slower shutter speeds (depending on your subject) than with its unstabilized competitors, so you may not have to use the higher ISOs as often.

Its JPEG processing generally does a good job of sharpening and reducing noise at base ISO, though Canon and Nikon have a slight edge when it comes to preserving fine details. At higher ISOs, the OM-5 II does a good job of reducing noise without smoothing away details, as do the rest of the cameras in this lineup.

We found the colors in the OM-5 II's JPEGs to be quite pleasing. They're not overly punchy, but are saturated enough to make images pop.

The multi-shot high resolution modes, which are thankfully processed in-camera rather than in a desktop app, can be used to gain a bit of extra detail under the right circumstances. They only work with very still subjects, such as landscapes (as long as there's not a lot of wind), which limits their usefulness.

Dynamic Range

Shot at base ISO and exposed to preserve highlights. Shadows lifted in Adobe Camera Raw and edited to taste.

OM-5 II | OM System 20mm F1.4 Pro | F4 | 1/160 sec | ISO 200
Photo: Mitchell Clark

The camera offers good dynamic range performance, giving you lots of flexibility to shoot to preserve highlights and to raise shadows in post. However, it doesn't have the advantage in read noise that it once did; when the OM-5 came out, we found it had substantially cleaner shadows than the (much more expensive) Panasonic GH6. Comparing it to the GH7, that's no longer the case, not that we suspect most people will be choosing between these two cameras, despite their shared sensor size.

Exposure Latitude | ISO Invariance

Autofocus The OM-5 II doesn't have eye detection or animal detection, but the tracking can do a decent job, even on somewhat wiggly subjects.
OM System 20mm F1.4 Pro | F2.8 | 1/8000 sec | ISO 800

The OM-5 II has several autofocus modes: single, continuous and continuous with tracking, as well as a special star autofocus mode for shooting the night sky. In the standard modes, you have several selection point shapes to choose from, ranging from a small single point to the whole area. You can also set up four custom-size zones and exclude whichever target modes you want from the menu.

To move the autofocus point or area, you can use the screen for tap-to-focus or the four-way controller. You can also enable the "AF targeting pad," which lets you use the right half of the screen as an autofocus controller while looking through the EVF. These options do a decent job of making up for the lack of an autofocus joystick, though we still occasionally found ourselves missing that direct physical control.

The OM-5 II's autofocus points only cover around 60% of the sensor, which means you'll have to be a bit more cautious when composing, trying to track a subject, or setting up your camera to get a shot when something enters the frame.

The OM-5 II has face/eye detection, which works in single, continuous, and manual focus modes, but it feels like a decidedly first-generation implementation. It typically only recognizes humans' eyes, not animals'. It can occasionally struggle to identify human faces if they're wearing glasses, tinted or clear. And unless you're using tap-to-focus, the camera won't respect your chosen focus point if it recognizes a face; it'll snap to it, and you'll likely have to turn detection off to get it to focus on something else.

The face detection also doesn't work in conjunction with tracking mode; you can have either it or tracking. And, frustratingly, you can't just switch to the C-AF + Tracking mode to turn off face detection; you have to turn off face detection to even be able to access the option, though the camera will automatically switch back to tracking in some (but not all) circumstances.

Autofocus Performance

The OM-5 II's single and continuous autofocus performance is snappy and accurate, generally doing a good job of driving the lens to get the subject in focus without having to hunt. There were very occasional misteps that resulted in slightly soft images, but overall we were quite pleased with it.

Its tracking performance is a slightly different story. While it could do a decent job of keeping the autofocus point on a selected subject, it does feel a ways behind what companies like Nikon, Canon and Sony are doing. The tracking point isn't always as tenacious as we'd like, and it was sometimes unable to lock onto lower-contrast subjects at all. It would also occasionally start to drift off the subject being tracked, and the tracking box the camera displays sometimes lagged behind what it was supposed to be tracking.

Because of its identity as an outdoor adventure camera, the tracking performance means you may have to work a bit harder if you're trying to photograph wildlife or athletic activities. For some, that won't be an issue, but it could lead to a slightly frustrating learning curve for beginner photographers who may otherwise find the OM-5 II's price and relatively robust feature set attractive.

Video

The OM-5 II's 4K/30 video is reasonably sharp for everyday use, but falls well short of the image quality you can get from other cameras like the Nikon Z50II and Fujifilm X-S20. It includes a Log profile that lets you shoot footage designed to retain flexibility for color grading, but unlike its more expensive siblings, can only do so in 8-bit, which severely limits that flexibility. It also lacks a 4K/60 mode for higher-resolution slow-motion.

Image ComparisonThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

It also lacks some of the assistance tools that are increasingly becoming standard for serious video shooting, such as a waveform monitor or false color preview, HDR output, or in-camera support for LUTs (though there is at least preview assistance when you're shooting in Log). And while it has a microphone socket, you won't have any way to monitor the audio, given its lack of a corresponding headphone port and apparent* lack of support for a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter.

This isn't to say that the OM-5 II isn't capable of casually shooting video, but it'd be a frustratingly limited tool for more serious shoots. For capturing clips, though, the IBIS is relatively effective at smoothing out hand shake and other movement, and the autofocus generally does a good job, though it can occasionally drift, especially when capturing more complex scenes.

This is made all the more disappointing as its rolling shutter performance is excellent, taking 10ms to read out the sensor when shooting in 4K/24.

* - We tested with one to no effect, but they're not always universal.

In Use

When I reviewed the OM-3, I found myself very willing to try out the handheld high-res mode to get a bit more image quality, even in situations where I was a little unsure whether it'd produce good results. That wasn't true with the OM-5 II; I quickly learned that the time it takes to process the 50MP images was far longer than I'm willing to wait. The other computational modes – made easier to access by the "CP" button – are a bit quicker, but it's the area where this camera's processor most shows its age. I also found that they ate through the camera's already relatively meager battery quite rapidly. That made me far less willing to use them outside of very specific scenarios where I knew I'd get the full benefit.

There are very few other cameras that I'd be willing to put in my backpack when paired with a 100-400mm equiv. lens.
OM System 50-200mm F2.8 IS Pro | F2.8 | 1/100 sec | ISO 2500

That frustration was somewhat offset by just how easy it was to take this camera anywhere. It's nowhere in the realm of pocketable, even with a small prime attached, but it's small enough that I found myself throwing it in whatever bag I was taking, just in case I ran into interesting things to photograph. That included bringing it along on a backpacking trip and a kayaking outing (my confidence perhaps a bit too buoyed by the IP53 rating), where I was able to get photos that looked substantially nicer than what my phone could've produced.

None of this will be a revelation to the Micro Four Thirds faithful, but it's a benefit worth reiterating. Although in theory someone should be able to build an APS-C rival with a comparable feature set, the OM-5 II still offers an unmatched combination of size, price and capabilities.

It's also hard to overstate how far the new menu system goes to making the camera feel more modern than the original OM-5. While there will be those who prefer a vertical tab system versus a horizontal one, the color coding and improved tips that give you a hint as to why certain options aren't selectable go a long way to making the camera feel more approachable. Their inclusion here makes their exclusion on the original OM-5 all the more baffling, but at least they're here now.

Minor complaint: if you set the function switch to act as the power switch (letting you turn the camera on and control it with the same hand), the default power switch on the left side of the camera becomes completely useless.

The new menus don't solve OM System's issue of its features not necessarily integrating with one another. It remains frustrating that you can't use the mode toggle switch, which would otherwise be a very handy feature, to switch between, say, continuous autofocus with facial recognition, and Tracking autofocus. The face detection mode (and any other modes added after the switch first appeared on the OM-D E-M5 II) can't be controlled by the switch; it will simply stay on, overriding Tracking AF. Still, the camera is very customizable, letting you reassign most of its buttons and dial directions.

Of course, USB-C is also a massive improvement, especially given that the OM-5 II has just okay battery life. Being able to charge your camera using the same equipment you have for your phone, computer, etc., is a luxury that you don't miss until it's gone, and it's a tradeoff this camera no longer asks you to make. Particularly for traveling, this is valuable.

Speaking of tradeoffs, though, we'll also point out that the OM-5 II isn't compatible with OM System's FL-LM3 flash unit, which we consider to be the best pack-in flash unit. We've written an entire article on the matter (and have since attached the flash to our OM-5 II to confirm it didn't work), but felt it deserved a mention here, given that the FL-LM3 did work with the original OM-5.

Conclusion

By Mitchell Clark

Pros Cons

Good image quality
New menus are a welcome improvement
IBIS and IP rating are excellent for the price
USB-C charging brings camera to modern age
Lots of features in a small package
Excellent handling for such a small camera

Dated video features
Computational features can take a while to process
Autofocus system isn't on par with cheaper options from Canon / Nikon / Sony, and even Fujifilm
Customization options can't always control newer features
Few cut features sting in such an otherwise small update

When viewed in a vacuum, it's hard to find much to complain about with the OM-5 II. It has a winning combination of good image quality, ergonomics and usability, combined with extra features you normally wouldn't get at this price point like an IP rating, computational photography modes and very solid IBIS. If this was your first camera, or if you were coming from a much older model, you'd probably be pretty happy with it.

There are, however, places where it starts to show its age. And unfortunately, it's in the basics. Autofocus is perhaps the most glaring; in 2025, even much cheaper cameras (which, admittedly, lack those aforementioned features) will provide more reliable tracking and offer greater AF area coverage and additional subject recognition types. Most will also have better video specs, with more flexible 10-bit recording modes and a headphone jack.

This camera's hardware also makes OM System's computational photography features – a major selling point on some of its other cameras – less appealing, because of just how long it takes to process them. That also means it's less convenient to use the high-resolution modes to gain back some of the image quality you give up by going with a smaller sensor.

For some thoughts on what the OM-5 II means for OM System and Micro Four Thirds, check out our initial review video.

The OM-5 II's biggest problem, at least initially, may be the original OM-5 itself, which is now selling for significantly less money. It's not that the Mark II doesn't offer any meaningful upgrades, because it does. But if you're willing to put up with microUSB and the old menus, you're getting essentially getting the same camera, but with slightly faster fixed-focus mechanical shutter burst rates and support for one of the best small flashes out there.

We do think there's a market for the OM-5 II. Like the company's other cameras, it still fits well into its niche as a tool for those traveling outdoors who may encounter bad weather and who don't necessarily want to bring a tripod. But as the entry point to that system, there are enough asterisks that you'd have to really want the specific things the OM-5 II is offering to choose it.

In theory, it's the kind of camera we'd love to recommend to people just starting out with the hobby, but its once ground-breaking spec is just a bit too far behind (in a way that cameras like the OM-3 and OM-1 / OM-1 II aren't) at this point for us to do that. As such, we don't feel as if we can grant it an award.

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.com Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo Scoring

Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category. Click here to learn about what these numbers mean.

OM System OM-5 IICategory: Mid Range Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLRBuild qualityErgonomics & handlingFeaturesMetering & focus accuracyImage quality (raw)Image quality (jpeg)Low light / high ISO performanceViewfinder / screen ratingOpticsPerformanceMovie / video modeConnectivityValuePoorExcellentConclusionThe OM-5 II still offers some of the most features at its price point, but doesn't nail the basics as well as its competitors.Good forTravelers who need a small kit Outdoor enthusiasts IBIS fansNot so good forSports and action shooters Videographers82%Overall scoreRegularScoreCompareWidget({"mainElementId":"scoringWidget","mainProduct":"omsystem_om5ii","scoringSchema":{"id":"SLRs","variables":[{"id":"BuildQuality"},{"id":"ErgonomicsAndHandling"},{"id":"Features"},{"id":"MeteringAndFocusAccuracy"},{"id":"QualityRaw"},{"id":"QualityJpeg"},{"id":"LowLightHighISO"},{"id":"ViewfinderScreenRating"},{"id":"Optics"},{"id":"Performance"},{"id":"Movie"},{"id":"Connectivity"},{"id":"Value"}],"categories":[{"id":"EntryLevel","label":"Entry Level Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Entry Level"},{"id":"MidRange","label":"Mid Range Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Mid Level"},{"id":"EntryLevelFullFrame","label":"Entry Level Full Frame Camera","shortLabel":"Entry Level Full Frame"},{"id":"MidRangeFullFrame","label":"Mid Range Full Frame Camera","shortLabel":"Mid Range Full Frame"},{"id":"SemiProfessional","label":"Semi-professional Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Semi-professional"},{"id":"SemiProfessionalFullFrame","label":"Semi-professional Full Frame Camera","shortLabel":"Semi-professional Full Frame"},{"id":"Professional","label":" Professional Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Professional"},{"id":"LargeSensorCompactEntry","label":"Entry Level Large Sensor Compact Camera","shortLabel":"Entry Level Large Sensor Compact"},{"id":"LargeSensorCompactEnthusiast","label":"Enthusiast Large Sensor Compact Camera","shortLabel":"Enthusiast Large Sensor Compact"},{"id":"VideoCamera","label":"Video Camera","shortLabel":"Video Camera"}]},"helpText":"Choose one or more cameras from the drop-down menu, then roll your mouse over the names to see how their scores compare to the camera on review."}) Compared to its Peers

The Canon EOS R10 will provide more capable autofocus with better general tracking, face detection, and support for detecting other kinds of subjects. Some users will also greatly appreciate the ability to select an autofocus point with a joystick, rather than a touchscreen or four-way controller, and others will benefit from its much better video spec and higher burst rates. While Canon tightly controls what lenses are available for APS-C RF cameras, the selection that's available now is quite good for most types of shooting, even if it's not as extensive as the Micro Four Thirds system. Of course, it does ask you to give up weather resistance and sensor stabilization.

The Fujifilm X-S20 also has better face-tracking and more subject detection modes, but the autofocus performance gap between it and the OM-5 II isn't quite as big as with the Canon. However, it's even more capable when it comes to video – the headphone jack is great for monitoring audio – and is the cheapest APS-C option to offer a stabilized sensor (though its US price has crept up by a few hundred dollars since we listed it as a competitor).

The Nikon Z50II's comparison will reach much the same as the Canon's; it has much better autofocus and video than the OM-5 II, but is slightly held back by lens selection and an unstabilized sensor. Like the OM-5 II, it lacks an AF selection joystick, though the reliability of its '3D Tracking' system means you may find yourself missing it less. It's also the only APS-C camera in this price range to make a claim of weather resistance, though it's the typical vague promise, rather than the IP rating OM System tests for.

Sample Gallery

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab. Pre-Production Sample Gallery Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

Kategorier: Produkt nyheder

Leica M EV1 preview

Nyt fra dpreview - 23 okt 2025 - 15:00

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content.

Product photos: Richard Butler

The Leica M EV1 is a full-frame manual focus mirrorless camera with a 60MP BSI sensor. It's shaped like the company's other M-series models but has no optical viewfinder or rangefinder mechanism, relying instead on an electronic viewfinder.

Key specifications

60MP BSI CMOS full-frame sensor
60, 36 or 18MP output, Raw or JPEG
5.76M dot OLED EVF with 0.76x magnification
Two-way Fn switch on front
2.33M dot LCD rear touchscreen
64GB of internal storage
2.4/5Ghz Wi-Fi

The Leica M EV1 is available everywhere except the USA, where gaining FCC approval has caused a delay. Once cleared for sale in the US, it will be available at a recommended price of $8995.

Index

What's new The Leica M EV1 features a new, diamond-patterned leatherette coating.

There's not much that's new on the M EV1, other than the concept of removing the rangefinder and optical viewfinder that goes with it, and replacing it with an EVF. Leica points out this isn't the first M-series camera to go without a rangefinder: the M1 made that move, while the MD, MD-a and MD-2 had no viewfinder, either.

Instead the M EV1 uses a variant of the 5.76M dot viewfinder found in the Q3 cameras, with 0.76x magnification. Unlike the conventional Ms, this viewfinder can accurately present the field of view of 21 and 24mm lenses, and show output from 90mm lenses at a decent size.

In addition to adapting better to a wider range of lenses, the magnified live view and focus peaking available in the viewfinder should allow greater precision than the traditional rangefinder mechanism, giving more reliable results with fast aperture lenses and not needing such careful handling or calibration.

How it compares

Leica cameras are luxury goods, as well as being cameras, so it's somewhat hard to compare them. When the brand name and cost (and the exclusivity it implies) are part of the allure, conventional spec comparisons fall apart.

At the most basic level, you can get essentially the same sensor in the Sony a7CR for considerable less money, and get a similar shooting experience by adapting your M-mount lenses to fit. It won't be as small, be as nicely built or say Leica on the front, but in purely pragmatic terms, it'll be comparable.

Leica M EV1 Leica M11-P Sony a7CR MSRP $8995 $9840 $3399 Sensor 60MP BSI CMOS
Full-frame 60MP BSI CMOS
Full-frame 60MP BSI CMOS
Full-frame Viewfinder 5.76M dot / 0.76x Optical 2.36M dot / 0.7x Focus system MF via liveview MF via rangefinder Autofocus
MF via liveview Shutter Up to 1/4000 Mech
Up to 1/16000 Elec
Sync 1/180 Up to 1/4000 Mech
Up to 1/16000 Elec Up to 1/4000 EFCS
Up to 1/8000 Elec
Sync 1/160 Video No No 4K/60 (1.2x crop)
4K/30 full-width
4K/30 (1.5x crop, 6.2K) Content credentials Yes Yes No Battery rating
LCD / Viewfinder 244 / 237 244 / 700 530 / 490 Dimensions 147 x 80 x 38mm 147 x 80 x 38mm 124 x 71 x 63mm Weight 484g 530g (black)
640g (silver) 515g

We could also have compared the Leicas to the company's own SL3 model or Sony's higher-specced a7R V, but we thought choosing the smaller Sony was the closest in size and format.

Of course we don't think anyone will actually be choosing between the Leicas and the Sony, but it gives some perspective on what you do and don't get for your money. But, while it's impossible to objectively say whether autofocus is inherently better than using a rangefinder (and hence haven't assigned red or green highlighting), our experience has been that both the M11-P and a7CR offer a lot that the M EV1 doesn't.

Body and handling

The M EV1 essentially has the same body as the M11-P but with no viewfinder window at the front. The ISO dial is also absent from the shoulder of the camera, presumably as the EVF extends further into the space it would usually occupy.

The rest of the layout is very similar. The body has a nice, solid-feeling weight to it, and it has the same minimalist design that fits in the hand nicely and gives off a sense of solidity when you hold it.

The move to an EVF allows you to adjust the diopter, using the little pop-out dial. It can be adjusted from -4 up to +2 correction.

The camera uses a menu system similar to the one we liked on the Q3 43, but unfortunately with the addition of a 'Leica Content Credentials' option that means it takes an extra step before you can get into the menu proper. It's an odd decision, given Content Credentials doesn't seem like a setting you're likely to want to change regularly.

Battery

The M EV1 uses the same BP-SCL7 battery as the rest of the M11 family of cameras. It's a fairly substantial 13.3Wh unit that Leica says will power the camera to a rating of 244 shots per charge if you use the rear screen and 237 if you use the viewfinder. These numbers use the CIPA testing standard, which tends to significantly under-represent the battery life, but sub 300 ratings usually mean having to carry a spare battery or external USB power pack if you're a prolific photographer.

Initial impressions

by Richard Butler

I remember the first time I got to use a Leica rangefinder. Within a few hours I'd taken two photos that I can still picture in my head, nearly two decades later. They weren't necessarily in perfect focus, but I found it so quick to match the overlayed images that I quickly came to see how a technology could be superseded several times over, yet not be rendered obsolete.

"Anyone really interested in photography should rent a rangefinder for a weekend," has been a recurring phrase I've used in the years since.

Sadly, the M EV1 offers none of this experience.

Leica M-Summicron 35mm F2 | F4.8 | 1/250 sec | ISO 64
Processed with Adobe Camera Raw
Photo: Richard Butler

Focus peaking makes it possible to match some of the speed of using a rangefinder, with perhaps somewhat similarly approximate focus. As with all these systems, it's highly dependent on aperture and light level, meaning everything can end up highlighted, at times, or nothing, sometimes. For the sort of precision that 60MP probably deserves, you'll need to use magnified live view.

Unlike some modern mirrorless cameras, the M EV1 doesn't have anything like a subject recognition system, to let you punch-in on potential subjects, so you'll have to tap on the screen or use the four-way controller to very slowly reposition the target point you want to zoom in on, though be careful not to tap the screen with your nose, if you're left-eye dominant, because that'll move your point, too.

Of course you could focus at the center and shift the camera, as you might with a rangefinder, but that would throw away any precision benefit that live view should have.

Leica M-Summicron 35mm F2 | F2.0 | 1/1250 sec | ISO 64
Processed with Adobe Camera Raw
Photo: Richard Butler

I wrote, back when the M11 was launched, that the flexibility of live view and the added focusing precision it offered risked making the rangefinder and optical viewfinder seem redundant. My experience with the M EV1 so far suggests I was wrong.

I should make clear, I'm not a fan of shooting with manual focus lenses on modern cameras, full-stop. I find it slow and imprecise, and the focus tools are nothing like as simple and fast (albeit imprecise) as a split prism finder on an SLR or a rangefinder.

This job doesn't allow me the leeway of being 'there or thereabouts' in terms of focus, and I just find the whole thing slow, frustrating and fiddly.

Leica M-Summicron 35mm F2 | F2.8 | 1/1160 sec | ISO 64
Photo: Richard Butler

Based on using the camera for a week, I can't see the point in paying 91% of the cost of a Leica rangefinder, only to get something that isn't a rangefinder and that's no more elegant to shoot with than any other mirrorless camera trying to manual focus. Yes it's beautifully made and it has a red dot, but I'm not sure you gain much over, say, a Sony a7CR, with which it shares a sensor.

After a few minutes of shooting with an M9, I understood why someone might buy a rangefinder. After a few days with the M-EV1, I'm at a loss to why anyone would buy this instead.

Kategorier: Produkt nyheder

Fujifilm X-T30 III preview

Nyt fra dpreview - 23 okt 2025 - 07:00

Product photos: Richard Butler

The Fujifilm X-T30 III is the company's latest entry-level, SLR-shaped mirrorless camera, with its latest color mode recipes and autofocus.

Key specifications

26MP X-Trans APS-C BSI CMOS sensor
Film simulation dial with recipe positions
Tilt up/down rear screen
2.36M dot EVF
4K/60 video with 1.18x crop, 6.2K/30 full-sensor capture
315 shot-per-charge battery life, 425 in power saving mode

The X-T30 III will be available from November 2025 at a recommended price of $999. There will also be the option to buy the camera with a new, unusually wide, 13-33mm F3.5-6.3 OIS zoom lens, which will cost around $1150.

Index

What's new? The Film Simulation dial on the camera's shoulder has three custom positions that can be assigned to film simulations or the simulation-and-parameter-tweak combinations known as 'recipes.'

The X-T30 III, as the name implies, is an iterative update of the existing X-T30 II. It gains the latest Fujifilm processor, which brings subject recognition autofocus. This brings it into line with the X-M5 and X-T50.

It also gains a Film Simulation dial, instead of the drive mode dial on the previous X-T30 models. Like the more expensive X-E5, the three custom positions on the dial can be set up to store 'recipes': sets of JPEG processing settings that modify the behavior of an underlying film simulation.

The more powerful processor also brings a boost in the video features, with 60fps 4K video options (with a 1.18x crop) and the option to shoot using the whole sensor in 6.2K resolution at up to 30fps.

Finally, the X-T30 III becomes the first model to be offered with a new 13-33mm F3.5-5.6 stabilized kit zoom. This offers an unusually wide 20-50mm equivalent range, which is likely to be a welcome capability for photographers whose previous experience has mainly been with the wide-angle cameras on smartphones.

What is it? The X-T30 III maintains the classic-SLR looks of the X-T series.

The X-T30 III plays the same role in the lineup as its predecessor did: the least expensive SLR-shaped camera in the Fujifilm range. Like the Mark II and the X-M5, it's built around an unstabilized 26MP BSI CMOS sensor. It's an APS-C-sized chip with Fujifilm's proprietary X-Trans filter pattern in front of it. This was originally designed to reduce visible errors in images but increasingly just seems to make the files a little more tricky to process.

The X-T30 III offers a decent set of features: it'll shoot moderately quickly, captures good quality video and offers a range of subject-recognition AF modes, making it quick and easy to focus on common subject types. It also has a switch to jump quickly to its Auto mode that tries to select the appropriate scene mode and settings for whatever you point it at. It's also somewhat unusual in still offering a small pop-up flash.

The standout feature of the X-T30 III, in common with the rest of the Fujifilm range, is the provision of its film simulation color modes, giving you a selection of (mostly) well-judged, attractive color responses, for your images. The Mk III puts these at your fingertips by providing a dedicated dial, making it easy to experiment with the different looks it offers.

How it compares

The X-T30 III is one of Fujifilm's entry-level models. The viewfinder means it's a little more expensive than the rangefinder-style X-M5, but it has a list price lower than that of the image-stabilized X-S20. We'll include the X-S20, as the most affordable stabilized APS-C camera.

In terms of rivals, the Nikon Z50II is probably the most like-for-like competitor, with Canon's EOS R10 also offering similar specs for similar money. We're omitting the distinctly elderly Sony a6400 as it only shoots 8-bit video and doesn't have such extensive subject recognition AF. The OM System lineup either offers the OM-D E-M10 IV for less money or the OM-5 II for more, both are built around smaller but stabilized sensors. The OM-5 II is the least expensive mirrorless camera to offer an 'IP' rating for its weather sealing.

Fujifilm X-T30 III Nikon Z50II Canon EOS R10 Fujifilm X-S20 MSRP $1000,
$1150 w/ 13-33mm $1010,
$1150 w/
16-50mm $1100,
$1250 w/
18-45mm $1500.
$1600 w/
15-45mm Resolution 26MP 21MP 24MP 26MP Stabilization Lens only Lens only Lens only In-body
(up to 7EV) Flash,
ISO 100 GN 5 GN 7 GN 6 GN 5 Cont. burst rate 8fps Mech
20fps Elec 11fps Mech
15fps Elec 15fps Mech
23fps Elec 8fps Mech
20fps Elec EVF 2.36M dots
0.62x mag 2.36M dots
0.67x mag 2.36M dots
0.59x mag 2.36M dot
0.62x mag Rear screen 1.62 dots
3.0"
Tilt up/down 1.04M dots
3.2"
Fully-artic. 1.04M dots
3.0"
Fully-artic. 1.84 dots
3.0"
Fully-artic. Video options 6.2K/30 open gate
4K/60 1.18x crop
4K/30 full-width 4K/60 1.44x crop
4K/30 full-width 4K/60 1.6x crops
4K/30 full-width 6.2K/30 open gate
4K/60 1.18x crop
4K/30 full-width Mic / 'phones? 2.5mm / Via USB adapter Yes / Yes Yes / No Yes / Yes Battery life rating 315 220 EVF / 230 LCD 210 EVF / 350 LCD 750 Dimensions 118 x 83 x 47mm 127 x 97 x 67mm 123 x 88 x 83mm 128 x 85 x 65mm Weight 378g 550g 429g 491g

In spec terms, there's not much to choose between these models. What the chart can't show is that the Nikon probably has the best autofocus tracking performance here, with the Canon a very close second (it's a little less dependable in video mode). This is still something of a weakness for the Fujifilm, though its subject-recognition modes do well.

Both the Canon and Nikon handle better than the Fujifilm, having fewer, but in our experience, better laid-out controls that are harder to operate accidentally. The Fujifilm's Auto switch will be handy for some users and anyone looking for a camera to grow into is more likely to find the lenses they want in the X mount, but the offerings for Canon and Nikon are (finally) improving, so it's worth investigating whether the lenses you think you might want are available for each system, before picking a camera body.

The X-T30 III is also the smallest camera here and offers a wider array of attractive color modes than its rivals. There's also the option of that slightly pricy but unusually wide kit zoom.

Body and handling The X-T30 II offers plenty of hands-on control, including two clickable command dials, an exposure comp dial and an AF joystick, but these have all been fitted into a small space.

The body of the X-T30 III is essentially the same as the one from previous X-T30 models, meaning it's slightly smaller than the X-T50 and lighter. A ridge down the front of the camera and a protruding bump on the back means it fits firmly in the hand, and feels secure thanks to the tactile rubber coating, front and rear.

The X-T30 III has a fair degree of external control, including six buttons that can be customized and four swipeable directions on the rear touch screen. It also has two well-positioned clickable command dials, a dedicated exposure comp dial and dedicated shutter speed dial, as well as that film simulation dial.

There's also a joystick for positioning the AF point or navigating the menus and flick switches under two of the dials to activate the flash and to engage full Auto mode.

While we're pretty impressed, overall with this level of direct and customizable control, we find it's perhaps a little overwhelming on a body this small. If you have larger fingers, or don't know what all the controls do, the X-T30 III risks being a bit of a handful.

The X-T30 III only has three ports on its right-hand side, but they offer a lot of functions.

In terms of ports, the X-T30 III has a 2.5mm socket the serves double-duty as a remote control connector or a mic input. Most mics use a 3.5mm plug, so you'll need an adapter to attach one. Below this there's a USB socket that can be used for charging the camera, transferring data or connecting a pair of headphones, with the supplied adapter.

Finally, there's the micro HDMI socket for outputting video or a Raw video data stream that can then be encoded by either a BlackMagic or Atomos external recorder to BRaw or ProRes Raw, respectively. This isn't the obvious model to do that from, especially not given how delicate micro HDMI sockets can be, but it's nice that Fujifilm hasn't omitted a feature this hardware can support.

Battery

The X-T30 III uses the same 8.7 Wh NP-W126S battery as most of Fujifilm's smaller cameras. It powers the camera to a rated value of 315 shots per charge, or 425 in 'Economy' mode. These numbers don't reflect the number of shots you'll get from the camera (getting twice the rated figure isn't unusual, depending on your use of image review, flash or burst shooting), but they're broadly comparable between cameras.

A figure of over 300 shots per charge is good for this class of camera and is likely to mean you can use it for a weekend of casual shooting without having to think about the battery. The battery can be recharged over USB.

Video The X-T30 III's video specs are competitive but there are other models better suited to video within the range.

The X-T30 III gains all the video modes we've seen appear in this generation of 26MP Fujifilm models. In many respects, it's a sensor better suited to video than the 40MP chip in their more expensive models, because it doesn't have to read out so much data to produce its 4K footage.

The X-T30 II can capture full-sensor, 'open gate' footage at up to 30p in 6.2K resolution, or it can deliver 4K derived from this 6.2K resolution in more common aspect ratios. It can shoot 4K at up to 60p with a slight crop.

Shooting mode Crop Rolling shutter rate 6K open-gate Full-width (3:2) 24ms 4K/24p Full-width (16:9) 21ms 4K/60p 1.18x 16ms 1080p/24p Full-width (16:9) 13ms

However, while the video specs are more than solid for this class of camera, the X-T30 III's lack of image stabilization makes the X-T30 II a harder camera to shoot good footage with. The kit zoom is stabilized, and you can add digital stabilization in the camera, but the X-S20 is probably the better choice if video is a significant interest to you. As well as stabilization, the X-S20 has standard 3.5mm mic and headphone sockets and is compatible with the accessory fan unit to extend recording times.

Initial impressions

by Richard Butler

The X-T30 III is a welcome update to one of Fujifilm's more affordable and popular models. The introduction of the higher-specced, and more expensive X-T50 made it less clear that it'd get another update, but here it is. For existing Fujifilm users, it's not likely to cause much excitement: it's just a familiar, existing model being brought into line with the rest of the range by inheriting familiar, existing features.

But for anyone outside the system, it's perhaps a bit more significant. It brings one of Fujifilm's more affordable cameras up to the same standard as models such as the X-M5 and X-S20. So you can now choose whether you want a rangefinder shaped camera or a DSLR-shaped one, you can choose whether you want to pay for image stabilization or not, and you can choose between the dedicated dials of the X-T series or the command dial approach of the X-S cameras.

Fujifilm's Film Simulation modes are a significant feature of its cameras, not because they mimic filmstocks, particularly, but because they offer a series of subtle and attractive color options.

Fujinon XC 13-33mm @ 33mm | F6.3 | 1/120 sec | ISO 160
Photo: Richard Butler

Personally, I've always found the little X-Ts to be somewhat awkward: they offer a lot of direct control on a very small body for both better and worse. I sometimes worry that this risks making them look intimidating to new users, but that's more of a hypothetical concern, in practice I find the controls just a bit too small and fiddly to really use.

My biggest concern is the small, easily pressed clickable front dial, which you'll almost certainly have to use if you want to shoot in aperture priority. I found it extremely difficult to turn without also pressing, which would result in the camera cycling out of Auto ISO to either the highest or lowest ISO setting. As someone who primarily shoots in aperture priority mode, and using the kit lens that lacks an aperture ring, I found I had to customize the front dial to only control aperture, to stop me inadvertently changing ISO constantly.

The unusually wide Fujinon XC 13-33mm F3.5-6.5 OIS lens that you can get in a bundle with the X-T30 III helps set it apart from its predecessor and its peers.

Fujinon XC 13-33mm @ 13.3mm | F8.0 | 1/680 sec | ISO 320
Photo: Richard Butler

Likewise, on the day I tried using the camera with gloves, I repeatedly caught the Q button with the edge of my gloves, popping up the quick menu. The good thing is that you can customize the camera to overcome these issues, but I had to make quite drastic changes to make it practical to use the camera in a hands-on manner, which just heightened my concern about the camera's controls not being optimized for either the inexperienced or the experienced user. At least, not out of the box.

The new kit zoom is an excellent addition, though. At F6.3 at the long end, it's a little slow, and not all my shots were quite as sharp as I'd hope, but the ability to just keep going wider and wider really set it apart from other entry-level models I've used.

Pre-production Fujifilm X-T30 III sample gallery

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

Kategorier: Produkt nyheder

The 8 Best mirrorless cameras in 2025

Nyt fra dpreview - 22 okt 2025 - 19:40

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Updated Oct 22, 2025

Well over a decade after Panasonic introduced the first mirrorless camera, they now dominate the interchangeable lens camera market. They include cameras designed for a wide range of photo and video pursuits and models at everything from budget to professional price points.

We've used and tested just about every current mirrorless camera on the market and picked out what we think are the stand-out models. We'll start with the most affordable models, then work our way up from there. In general terms, as you move up the price ladder, you'll see larger sensors with better image quality, higher resolution, faster burst rates, and more capable video specs. We'll explain why we've chosen each camera and try to explain the advantages and disadvantages of each choice.

Our picks:

Best affordable kit: Sony a6100

24MP APS-C sensor | Hybrid AF with Real-time Tracking | 4K video capture

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.com $598 at B&H Photo Buy at MPB What we like:

Excellent autofocus system
4K/30p video recording
Tilting touchscreen LCD

What we don't:

Less robust build quality
Rolling shutter 'jello effect' present in 4K video
Crop when recording 4K/30p video

The Sony a6100 is an entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera. While it's one of the older camera still available, its 24MP sensor, touchscreen for easy focus placement and Sony's excellent autofocus tracking, which especially excels at focusing on people and pets, still make it excellent value for its price.

It's happiest if you prefer to point-and-shoot in an auto mode. The wide range of lenses available for it give you somewhere to grow if you find yourself catching the photography bug and, if you shop smart, you can get the body and a lens for around $1000 (though we'd recommend staying away from Sony's default 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 II kit option).

The a6100 is the most basic model in the a6000-series and doesn't feel quite as robust as its step-up siblings. It offers a lower-resolution electronic viewfinder, and twin control dials that are both thumb-operated. Its touchscreen flips upward 180-degrees for easy selfie framing and vlogging. Sony's autofocus system has been trained to recognize people and pets as subjects, and will follow them flawlessly throughout the frame. Coupled with the ability to touch the screen to place a focus point, it's a system that will serve beginner users very well, whatever they're shooting. "The a6100's autofocus can effortlessly track whatever you point it at" The a6100 makes it easy to record 4K footage or slow-motion 1080 video. There's a socket to connect an external mic but no way to connect headphones for monitoring. It can be set up for tap-to-track autofocus in video, too. There's significant 'jello-effect' distortion in the 4K footage though, especially in 24p mode. The a6100 is a good entry-level camera with a very powerful, easy-to-use autofocus system. We're not huge fans of the kit zoom and the interface isn't especially welcoming, but with a few settings changes, it can help you get excellent shots, easily.

Read our Sony a6100 review

See the Sony a6100 studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. Best value around $1000 - Nikon Z50II

20.9MP APS-C sensor | Subject recognition AF | Full-width 4K video up to 30p

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:

$1049 w/ 16-50mm at Amazon.com $906 at Adorama $906 at B&H Photo What we like:

Twin command dials
Simple tracking AF w/ subject recognition
Strong video specs

What we don't:

Weak battery life
Limited zoom lens selection
Non-stabilized sensor limits video

The Nikon Z50II is an entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera, built around a 21MP CMOS sensor. It features Nikon's '3D tracking' autofocus system, and can recognize nine subject types.

It represents a step up over the a6100, offering similarly powerful autofocus (though with more autofocus subject recognition types) and much more welcoming controls for when you want to be more involved in the photo-taking process. Nikon places some restrictions on what lenses third parties can make, but there are increasingly more sensible options; if the ones you want are available for it, the Z50II is the best option at this price point.

It has a solid grip, twin top-plate control dials, and a wide variety of customizable buttons, including one that, by default, controls color mode. Focusing is handled using the touchscreen or four-way controller. Autofocus is very good with subject detection being especially good. However, human detection doesn't seem as sticky and 3D Tracking isn't as dependable as on Nikon's higher-end models. Otherwise, the camera is snappy and can even do 30fps pre-capture, though it's JPEG only. The Z50II delivers on the basics without breaking the bank. The Z50II can shoot Log or HLG video and has a waveform monitor to help set correct exposure. A headphone socket helps maintain audio quality but the lack of in-body stabilization counts against its use for video. The Z50II is a solid hybrid camera, with several features from Nikon's higher-end cameras. The lack of a stabilized sensor is the one mark against what are otherwise very good video specs, and you may find the lens selection limited if you want a camera to grow with you.

Read our full Nikon Z50II review

See the Nikon Z50II studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. Best APS-C mirrorless camera: Fujifilm X-T5 Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:

$1999 at Amazon.com Buy at B&H Photo Buy at MPB What we like:

Dedicated dial interface shows your settings
Detailed 40MP images
Photo-centric design and feature set

What we don't:

Autofocus prone to false-positives
Significant rolling shutter in e-shutter mode
Smaller buffer, lower-spec video than X-H2

The Fujifilm X-T5 is an enthusiast-level APS-C mirrorless camera built around a stabilized, 40MP BSI CMOS sensor with the company's X-Trans color filter array. It has plenty of features for both photo and video shooters.

What really lands it on this list, though, is how lovely it is to use. There are physical controls for all your exposure settings alongside configurable top-plate command dials, a big, bright EVF, and its JPEG colors are especially pleasing with a wide range of sensible (and more out-there) "Film Simulation" color modes. Though there are more technically capable APS-C cameras on the market, for a lot of photography we'd give up a bit of AF tracking performance and speed for the X-T5's user experience.

The X-T5 features dedicated control dials for ISO, shutter speed and exposure compensation, along with a film-era SLR-style low-profile front grip. Its rear screen tilts up and down but also hinges outward for portrait-orientation shooting. The X-T5 can detect a variety of subjects from animals to vehicles, and tracking performance is quite good with these. Tracking for unrecognized subjects is less dependable and eye detection is prone to false positives. Buffer depth while shooting at 15fps is reasonable. The X-T5 foregoes some of the X-H2's video features to offer a more photo-centric experience with classic styling Video performance can be either full width but less detailed, or oversampled from a crop of the sensor. The use of SD cards means it doesn't share the X-H2's high-data-rate ProRes options. There's no headphone jack but audio can be monitored through the USB port with an included adapter. Having the X-H2 and X-H2S available to meet the needs of videographers allows the X-T5 to fulfill photographers' desires for stills-centric handling and features. For photographers who enjoy Fujifilm's traditional dial-based controls, there's no more capable body than the X-T5.

Read our full Fujifilm X-T5 review

See the Fujifilm X-T5 studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. What are my other APS-C options?

The Sony a6700 is the most capable APS-C camera on the market, with extremely strong autofocus performance, image quality and video capabilities. Sony's E-mount also has the most complete array of APS-C lenses after Fujifilm's, largely thanks to support from third parties. However, we don't find it as pleasurable to use as the X-T5 – its viewfinder is smaller and lower-res, and the lack of an AF joystick making picking a focus point a bit more of a chore – but if technical prowess is what you seek, the a6700 is your best bet.

Buy now:

$1398 at Amazon.com $1398 at B&H Photo Buy at MPB

Canon also builds some decent APS-C competitors that rival Sony's performance, but while you can now get some several decent third-party fast zooms for them, the company still restricts what lenses can exist on RF-mount.

Fujifilm's X-T50 is also worth considering if you're looking at APS-C cameras

Photo: Richard Butler

Finally, if you were enticed by the X-T5 but are on a budget, we'd suggest considering the Fujifilm X-T50. It packs the same sensor and processor into a smaller, lighter design. While the viewfinder isn't as nice, and the controls are a little more fiddly, in return you get the film simulation dial, which encourages you to play with different looks. It can also be kitted with the excellent 16-50mm F2.8-4.8 OIS zoom, which is significantly better than the lenses bundled with other companies' APS-C offerings

Buy now:

$1399 at Amazon.com $1399 at B&H Photo Buy at MPB Full-frame mirrorless

Full-frame cameras (those with image sensors the same size as traditional "35mm" film) offer the potential for better image quality than smaller formats, simply because they have a larger area on which to capture light. However, you don't get something for nothing: even if you can find an affordable, compact full-frame camera at a good price, the lenses needed to make the most of it will be larger and will typically cost more than those for APS-C or Four Thirds sensors. Broadly speaking, there's a balance to be struck between image quality, size and price, which is worth contemplating before you make the assumption that full-frame is the best (or even 'better') format.

Best value full-frame mirrorless: Nikon Z5II

24MP BSI full-frame sensor | In-body image stabilization | Dual UHS-II card slots

Photo: Mitchell Clark

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.com Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo What we like:

Excellent image quality
Very good autofocus, for a range of subjects
Excellent handling, ergonomics and feature set

What we don't:

Reasonable, but not great, battery life
Needs to crop to deliver 4K/60
Lens choice limited by Nikon

The Nikon Z5II is a full-frame mirrorless camera built around a 24MP BSI CMOS sensor.

Don't be scared by the "value" part of this pick; the Z5II doesn't feel cheap, and there aren't obvious features cut for cost. In fact, we suspect most photographers would struggle to push its limits, and unless you must absolutely have faster or higher-resolution shooting or top-end video, it's hard to argue that most people truly need anything better.

The Z5II is a solid camera with a deep grip and plenty of customizable buttons. It's comfortable to use, even for long sessions using a relatively large lens. The autofocus is very good, especially in subject recognition modes. It's not quite as dependable at recognizing people in low light, but it's very competitive and light-years better than even higher-end cameras from just a few years ago. The Nikon Z5II is almost unimaginably good for a camera priced under $2000. Video quality is good, though with a decent amount of rolling shutter, and it offers advanced options like Log, HLG HDR and N-Raw capture. Autofocus isn't as dependable as it is in stills. Image quality is excellent, and the Z5II can capture HLG HDR images using HEIF files for a more life-like viewing experience. The Z5II is an impressive all-rounder that delivers excellent image quality and good video, underpinned by very good autofocus in a body that's well-designed and comfortable to use. It's hard to see what more an enthusiast photographer could want from a camera.

Read our full review of the Nikon Z5II

See the Nikon Z5II studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. What are the other entry-level full-frame options?

We also think the Canon EOS R8 is worth considering if you're looking for a comparatively affordable full-frame camera. Like Nikon's Z-mount system, Canon's RF lens ecosystem is also somewhat short on affordable lenses to pair with an entry-level camera.

Its usability it what keeps it from topping this guide; it has shorter battery life and smaller viewfinder than the Z5II, and lacks in-body image stabilization, a second SD card slot and an AF joystick. However, it can shoot 4K60 video without a crop, which could be interesting to videographers, though, unlike the Z5II, it doesn't offer any Raw options.

Buy now:

$1499 at Amazon.com $1499 at Adorama $1499 at B&H Photo Best mid-priced full-frame mirrorless: Nikon Z6III

25MP full-frame 'Partially Stacked' CMOS sensor | 6K/60p N-Raw video | 5.76M dot OLED 0.8x EVF

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.com Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo Buy at MPB What we like:

Very good image quality
Good autofocus tracking with auto subject recognition mode
Extensive choice of video resolutions and codecs

What we don't:

Peak dynamic range lower than peers
N-Raw video format has limited support
Nikon controls 3rd-party lens options

The Nikon Z6III is Nikon's third-generation full-frame enthusiast mirrorless camera, with a 'partially stacked' 25MP CMOS sensor.

The Nikon Z6III is a significant step up for the Z6 series, and is a very capable camera for both stills and video. Its main benefit over less expensive models are its sensor readout speeds – and, therefore, rolling shutter performance in video – which are among the best in its category.

The Z6III has an ample grip and easy-to-use control scheme. Nikon's menus and touchscreen layout are also well-refined, but the camera lacks the company's traditional AF mode button or front-corner switch. The Z6III is a genuine do-anything camera with excellent video and photo capabilities. Autofocus is generally reliable, and the camera includes Nikon's 3D-tracking system and plenty of subject recognition modes. It can shoot 20 raws per second, or 60fps in JPEG mode. The Z6III shoots many video formats, including Raw, and has dependable subject-tracking autofocus and a waveform display. Its 4K and 5.4K modes produce excellent detail, even in 60p, and its rolling shutter performance is outstanding. Image quality is very good, with lots of detail and acceptable amounts of noise. There is a recognizable dynamic range tradeoff for that speed, but it's only noticeable in extreme situations. The Z6III is a significant step-up from its predecessor and is to-date the most all-round capable camera in its class. It excels in both stills and video.

Read our full review of the Nikon Z6III

See the Nikon Z6III studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. The mid-priced rivals

There are plenty of other cameras worth considering, in the around $2000 price category. Canon's EOS R6 II is probably the strongest competitor to the Z6III. It has a slightly smaller viewfinder, and its video specs aren't as good, but if you're just looking to shoot stills, your choice between the two should be dictated purely by which system has the lenses you want at prices you're happy with.

If you shoot outside a lot and need a compact system with excellent weather sealing, the OM System OM-1 II is worth considering; outside of that use case, it's probably worth considering other options unless you're heavily invested in Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Sony's a7C II is also a reasonable choice, as its high-resolution sensor is good for stills, though its slow readout speeds limit its video capabilities. Its autofocus is Sony's latest (unlike with the full-size Sony a7 IV), and it's appreciably smaller than its rivals. The viewfinder is small, and there's no AF joystick, though, which are the main reasons it's not one of our main picks: it's better on paper than in the hand.

Best high-end mirrorless camera: Canon EOS R5 II

45MP Stacked CMOS sensor | Eye-controlled AF subject selection | Up to 30fps continuous shooting

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:

$5349 at Amazon.com Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo What we like:

Excellent image quality
Fast, dependable autofocus
Good video support tools

What we don't:

Slight reduction in dynamic range in extreme scenarios
Tempermental eye control
Temperature limits in heaviest video modes

The Canon EOS R5 II is one of the most capable cameras we've ever tested and will almost certainly be up to any task that most photographers can throw at it. It shoots at high resolution, has an excellent autofocus system and sports plenty of video features.

The grip is very well-shaped and proportioned, and the controls are all well-placed and comfortable to use for extended periods. Eye Control for autofocus is excellent when it works, which isn't always The EOS R5 II has excellent tracking and subject-tracking autofocus performance. The subject detection is effective without getting in your way. It can shoot Raws at up to an extremely rapid 30fps. The EOS R5 II does a vast range of things, most of them extremely well: it's impressive for action, landscapes, video, you name it. It has plenty of video options up to Raw 8K/60p, offering high levels of detail, though it can overheat when shooting in its most impressive modes. Its rolling shutter rates are generally quite good. The 45MP Raws are highly detailed, and the JPEG sharpening and noise reduction are sensible. It can't quite match higher-resolution cameras like the A7R V, but performs well in its own right. The EOS R5 II excels at almost everything it tries to do, and that's a long list. It's hard to imagine what photo or video need it won't support you in.

Read our Canon EOS R5 II review

See the Canon EOS R5 II studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. A worthy competitor

The strongest competitor to the EOS R5 II besides the original EOS R5 is Nikon's Z8. And, frankly, there's very little to choose between them. Canon's high-end model has some features that could be useful to certain photographers, like Action Priority AF and Eye Control, but outside of that your choice should again be dictated by lens selection, as they're both supremely capable cameras.

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.com Buy at Adorama Buy at B&H Photo Compact high-resolution: Sony a7CR

61MP BSI CMOS sensor | 4K/60p video with 10-bit color | Dedicated ‘AI’ processor for AF system

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.com Buy at B&H Photo Buy at MPB What we like:

Big camera features in a small body
Outstanding AF performance
Auto Framing video mode

What we don't:

Small, low-res viewfinder
No joystick control
No fully mechanical shutter

The Sony a7CR takes most of the features of the more expensive a7R V and provides them in a smaller package. The viewfinder is disappointing for such an expensive camera, but nothing gives you so much image quality in such a small, capable package.

The a7CR is impressively small for a full-frame camera. The addition of a front control dial improves handling significantly. Notably, there’s no joystick for positioning the AF point, and the viewfinder is small and very low resolution for a camera costing this much. Autofocus performance on the a7CR is very good and is helped by a dedicated processor for crunching complex machine learning-trained algorithms. Subject recognition is quick, and the AF system tracks subjects tenaciously around the frame in either stills or video. 8 fps burst shooting with continuous AF results in a dependably high hit rate. "If you're looking for maximum resolution in a travel-sized body, the a7RC is tough to beat." The a7CR captures 4K video at up to 60 fps. The most detailed, oversampled footage results from a 1.2x crop of the sensor, which makes it challenging to maintain wider focal lengths. Auto Framing mode uses AI algorithms to mimic the way a camera operator might punch in on subjects, keeping them framed and in focus. The a7CR's 61MP sensor can capture a lot of detail, putting it ahead of most full-frame rivals; though it is a little noisier in low light. JPEG colors are pleasing, and excellent sharpening makes the most out of the 61MP sensor. Raw files provide plenty of latitude to pull up shadows at base ISO. The a7CR delivers impressive results for its size. It essentially provides the same level of image quality, and most of the same features, as Sony's a7R V, but in a smaller package. In exchange for the small size, you make a few compromises, like no AF joystick, but if you're looking for maximum resolution in a travel-sized body, the a7CR is tough to beat.

Read our Sony a7CR initial review

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. IQ above all else: Fujifilm GFX 100S II

102MP BSI medium format sensor | In-body image stabilization | 5.76M dot viewfinder

Photo: Mitchell Clark

Buy now:

$5699 at Amazon.com $4999 at Adorama $4999 at B&H Photo What we like:

Excellent detail capture
Very high tonal quality
Ready-to-go JPEG or malleable Raws

What we don't:

Autofocus not especially fast
Video prone to rolling shutter

The Fujifilm GFX 100S II is a 100MP medium format mirrorless interchangeable lens camera with built-in image stabilization.

This camera is perhaps the most specialized pick on this list: it's not especially fast or versatile but in terms of image quality, it essentially offers the best levels of detail we've ever seen. It's a true step up over even the best of its full-frame rivals (some of which comes from its lenses - the GF primes often being particularly good).

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. What are the other high-end options?

Just about all the cameras that cost $2500 and up are, unsurprisingly, rather good. We go into a little more detail about their relative merits in our 'High-end camera buying guide.' As at any price, the key things to consider are what types of photography you plan to do (and hence, which features and capabilities are most important to you), and whether the lenses you need are available at a price you're willing to pay.

Why you should trust us

This buying guide is based on cameras used and tested by DPReview's editorial team. We don't select a camera until we've used it enough to be confident in recommending it, usually after our extensive review process. The selections are purely a reflection of which cameras we believe to be best: there are no financial incentives for us to select one model or brand over another.

Kategorier: Produkt nyheder

Produkt nyheder

Canon EOS R6 Mark III preview

OM System OM-5 II review

Leica M EV1 preview

Fujifilm X-T30 III preview

The 8 Best mirrorless cameras in 2025

Nyheder fra redaktionen

Husk at bruge bloggen...

Nyt i kalenderen

Produkt nyheder

Sidste nyt