Nyt fra dpreview

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Updated July 9, 2025

It's sad to say, but the golden age of compact cameras is pretty much over, thanks to the rise of smartphone cameras that are, in many cases, good enough for most people. Manufacturers seem to realize this, too; the major players have only released a small handful of compact zooms in the past few years, and most were very minor updates on old designs. The ones that remain can be difficult to find in stock, even when the companies that make them promise they're still a part of their lineups.

However, that doesn't mean the category is completely dead. Even today, there are several types of compact cameras, and some have capabilities that pretty much no phone can match. This list calls out the few that are still available and looks at what they're good for – because there are still cases where a compact camera is a great option.

Our recommendations:

• Enthusiast camera
  • Best enthusiast compact: Canon PowerShot G7X III
  • Best do-it-all compact: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII
  • Best interface: Leica D-Lux 8

• Waterproof cameras
  • Best waterproof compact: OM System Tough TG-7

• Long zoom camera
  • Best ultra-zoom camera: Nikon Coolpix P1100

• Vlogging cameras
  • Best vlogging compact: Canon PowerShot V1

Enthusiast compacts

The final niche in which it's difficult for a smartphone to compete is for enthusiast photography. No matter how good smartphone image quality gets, it's difficult for a phone to provide the feeling of connection to the process of taking photos that an enthusiast compact with lots of direct controls can offer.

We've picked cameras with large sensors that deliver good image quality, zoom lenses and direct controls. Some have built-in electronic viewfinders for shooting when it's bright outside, again giving a more pleasant experience than a smartphone.

Best enthusiast compact: Canon PowerShot G7 X III

20MP Type 1 Stacked CMOS sensor | 24-100mm equiv. F1.8-2.8 lens | 4K/30p video capture

Photo: Dan Bracaglia

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.comBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at MPB What we like:

• Nice grip and well-placed controls
• 4K/30p recording with live streaming to YouTube
• Fast burst shooting

What we don't:

• Lens is soft at wide-angle
• Limited battery life
• Contrast-detect only autofocus

The Canon PowerShot G7 X III is an enthusiast compact built around a 20MP Type-1 (13.2 x 8.8 mm) Stacked CMOS sensor with a bright 24-100mm equivalent F1.8-2.8 zoom.

The large sensor, and zoom that covers a really useful range help set it apart from a smartphone but it's clicking control dial around the lens and the dedicated exposure compensation dial that really help you feel you're in the driving seat of the photo-taking process that makes us enjoy it so much.

This camera is frequently out of stock, but Canon has told investors it was ramping up production of its compacts, citing the popularity of the G7 X III, and has assured us it's still in production.

"If you're after a pocketable high-quality compact, the Canon G7 X Mark III is well worth a look" Though it's jacket-pocketable, the G7 X Mark III has a decent-sized grip and feels secure in the hand. The 'clicky' control rings around the lens and on the rear of the camera give good control over aperture, shutter speed and ISO, and the exposure compensation dial on the top plate is a nice touch. The touchscreen interface on its tilting 3" LCD is polished and responsive. Overall, we're impressed by the upgrades on this model. The Mark III brings improved video and continuous shooting performance while maintaining excellent controls and a competitive price point. If you do a lot of wide-angle shooting, there are options with better lenses, but if you're after a pocketable high-quality compact, the Canon G7 X Mark III is well worth a look.

Read our Canon PowerShot G7X III review

See the Canon PowerShot G7X III studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. What about the PowerShot V1?

Canon's PowerShot V1 may tempt photographers hungry for a new compact thanks to its pairing of a large Type 1.4 (18.4 x 12.3mm) sensor and ultra-wide angle 16-50mm equiv. lens. However, we wouldn't recommend it unless you really need that lens or plan to shoot just as many videos as stills; the controls simply aren't engaging for photography enthusiasts.

Best do-it-all compact: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII

20MP Type 1 Stacked CMOS sensor | 24-200mm equiv. F2.8-4.5 lens | Hybrid AF system

Photo: Dan Bracaglia

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.comBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at MPB What we like:

• Industry-leading autofocus
• Excellent image quality
• Oversampled 4K video

What we don't:

• User interface can be overwhelming
• Low light performance limited by slow lens
• Slippery grip
• Expensive

The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII is built around a 20MP Stacked CMOS sensor and a long, flexible 24-200mm equivalent lens. It's not as bright at the long end as the zooms on the now-discontinued Mark VA or the Canon G7 X III, but it provides a lot more reach, still in a compact package.

Like the Canon, the RX100 VII can be difficult to find, but Sony tells us it's still making it. It also uses micro USB to charge instead of the near-ubiquitous and, in the EU, legally-mandated USB-C. US buyers should also be conscious of price; the camera launched at $1200, but when it's available, it now seems to be selling for around $1700, though Sony hasn't said if this is the result of tariffs or other factors.

"The RX100 VII is the most capable pocketable camera ever made" The RX100 VII has a limited number of direct controls, but offers extensive customization for making the most of them. A touchscreen can be used for choosing a focus point or initiating AF tracking in video. The camera also includes the single-press pop-up viewfinder we liked so much on its predecessor. The RX100 VII is easily the most-capable compact camera on the market thanks to its great image and video quality, fast shooting, versatile lens and a highly-capable, easy-to-use AF system, though all of that comes with a high price tag.

Read our Sony RX100 VII review

See the Sony DSC-RX100 VII studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. Best interface: Leica D-Lux 8

17MP crop of Four Thirds sensor | 24-75mm equiv F1.7-2.8 | 4K video

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:

Buy at AdoramaBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at Leica What we like:

• Photo-focused interface
• Large sensor
• Bright lens

What we don't:

• Zoom is laggy and slow
• Lens not always sharpest

The Leica D-Lux 8 is an enthusiast compact with one of the largest sensors with a fixed zoom lens.

The D-Lux 8 combines an enjoyable shooting experience with a large sensor and bright lens. It's expensive, for sure – a situation made even worse for US buyers thanks to tariffs – but it is one of the few enthusiast compacts to receive a refresh in recent years, so we felt it deserved a spot on this list.

"The D-Lux 8 is a lovely camera to shoot with and offers a lot of image quality in a compact package" The D-Lux 8 has an elegant and photo-focused interface, with dedicated dials for shutter speed and aperture, and a couple of buttons that are easy to customize. It's engaging and enjoyable to shoot with. The D-Lux 8 is a lovely camera to shoot with and offers a lot of image quality in a compact package. But, for us, its image quality doesn't live up to its promise, or its price tag.

Read our Leica D-Lux 8 review

See the Leica D-Lux 8 studio scene

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. Waterproof cameras

Waterproof cameras are another specialty that smartphones can't necessarily displace. Many flagship phones are waterproof to a decent degree but you shouldn't try to submerge them to any appreciable depth or use them in salt water. Waterproof cameras also tend to be pretty rugged, designed to withstand a lot more mistreatment than a phone will withstand, meaning you can carry them with you at all times, without ever having to worry about it. Great for bikers, climbers and custodians of small, inquisitive but not necessarily careful children.

Best waterproof camera: OM System Tough TG-7

25-100mm equiv. F2.0-4.9 lens | 12MP Type 1/2.3 sensor | Waterproof to 15m (50ft)

Buy now:

$497 at Amazon.comBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at MPB What we like:

• Bright, wideangle lens
• Built-in GPS, compass and manometer
• Raw image capture allowing creating edits
• Range of accessories

What we don't:

• 12MP is fairly low
• Lens isn't very bright at long end
• Limited battery life
• Relatively expensive

The OM System Tough TG-7 is a rugged, waterproof compact with a 25-100mm equivalent zoom lens. It is fully waterproof down to a depth of 15m (50 ft).

The OM System isn't the only rugged waterproof still on the market, nor the cheapest, but it has several major factors in its favor. The first is that it lets you shoot Raw images, which gives you the ability to correct the white balance, which even the best cameras tend to get wrong when shooting underwater. Another factor is that there is a range of accessories for the TG-7, including a light guide that directs light from the built-in flash into a circle around the lens, letting you illuminate close-up objects.

"The TG-7 is relatively expensive but packs in a host of useful features that help it stand out"

Beyond this there are a few details that different users may find handy: it has an unusually wide-angle lens with a bright maximum aperture, helping the performance underwater and in low light. It also has a built-in GPS, compass and pressure sensor that lets you log your adventures. These all add up to a camera that's worth the added expense, we feel.

Read our hands-on with the OM System TG-7 article

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. Long zoom cameras

Perhaps the greatest weakness of smartphones is their lack of zoom capabilities. Many of the best phones have a camera with a slightly longer focal length and then try to crop into their images and use AI algorithms to try to approximate the fine detail to give the impression of zooming, but this has its limits.

Dedicated cameras aren't constrained by the need to slip into your pocket, which can afford them the space to have an optical zoom lens to gain you more reach than your smartphone can deliver. There can be a trade-off: the small sensors required to put lots of zoom in a relatively small camera will be outshone by the computational cleverness that smartphones bring to bear on their images. But superzoom cameras can gain you the kind of reach that no current smartphone can get near.

Best ultra-zoom camera: Nikon Coolpix P1100

16MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor | 24-3000mm equiv. F2.8-8 lens | 4K video capture

Photo: Barney Britton

Buy now:

$1097 at Adorama$1097 at B&H Photo What we like:

• Focal range cannot be matched by any camera
• Respectable image quality, given camera's purpose
• Raw support
• Well-built, with logical control layout

What we don't:

• Large and unbalanced when zoom is extended
• Lens is slow at long end, reducing sharpness
• No touchscreen
• Poor battery life

The Nikon Coolpix P1100 is a very slightly refreshed version of the P1000, with the biggest difference being the adoption of a USB connector. Its Type 1/2.3 (6.17 x 4.55mm) sensor will be out-performed by a good smartphone's clever merging of multiple images but the Nikon's gargantuan 24-3000mm equiv. lens is its selling point.

The small sensor means image quality isn't the camera's strength, but its frankly ludicrous zoom reach means it can photograph distant subjects in a way no other device (smartphone or dedicated camera) can.

The P1100 is a large camera that weighs a substantial 1.4kg (3.2lbs). We found it can be difficult to compose a photo at 3000mm equiv since the stabilization can't fully correct hand movement. A 'snapback' function quickly zooms out so you can locate your subject. The P1100's fully articulating LCD, is not touch-enabled. Connectivity to smartphones works well. "When it comes to zoom power, there's no camera that comes close to Nikon's Coolpix P1100" The P1100's image quality depends greatly on the focal length. Photos are generally on par with other small-sensored cameras, with pleasant colors and a bit too much noise reduction. It offers Raw, though, so you can choose your noise/detail balance and modestly brighten shadows. Heat haze, coupled with the lens's slow maximum aperture limit image quality at the longest focal lengths. The P1100 has very good video quality for a camera with point-and-shoot roots. It can capture 4K video at 30p (with no crop) as well as 1080/60p and time-lapse/super-lapse clips. There's a manual exposure mode, a zoom microphone and a socket for addition an external mic. Electronic Vibration Reduction is available at 1080p and below. When it comes to zoom power, nothing comes close to Nikon's Coolpix P1100. Whether it's taking a portrait from 2 blocks away or getting up close and personal with a bird in the distance, this lens can do it. That said, while other cameras can't match that lens, many will offer better image and video quality for the same money, especially those with larger sensors.

Read our review of the existing P1000 model

See the Nikon Coolpix P1000 studio scene

In memoriam

Since we last updated this guide, our pick for the best long-zoom camera, the Sony RX10 IV, appears to have been fully discontinued. It was essentially the only high-end long zoom camera on the market, with a large Type-1 (13.2 x 8.8mm) Stacked CMOS sensor and a 24-600mm equivalent F2.8-4.0 zoom lens, and competent (though not cutting-edge) autofocus. If you're looking for a camera with excellent reach and image quality, it may be worth poking around for a used model; it's unclear whether we'll see the likes of this camera again.

Vlogging cameras

Smartphones are great for vlogging, but a dedicated vlogging camera can shoot better quality video, have more sophisticated microphones (and provide options for connecting better mics), and can autofocus very reliably, dependably delivering YouTube-ready footage.

Best vlogging compact: Canon PowerShot V1

16-50mm F2.8-4.5 zoom | 22MP 18x12mm Dual Pixel CMOS sensor | 4K/60 with crop

Buy now:

$979 at Amazon.comBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at Canon What we like:

• Attractive output in stills and video
• Versatile wide-angle zoom
• Fan for extended video recording

What we don't:

• Relatively large body
• Full width video has appreciable rolling shutter
• Optimized for vlogging vs stills

The Canon PowerShot V1 is a mid-sized vlogging compact with a relatively large sensor and wide zoom lens.

It offers a competitive suite of vlogging features, a built-in ND filter and good stabilization options. It's also comfortable to hold pointing towards you, and lets you access key settings from the touchscreen. It includes microphone and headphone jacks and a fan for extended recording sessions.

AF performance is good, with reliable tracking AF and effective subject recognition. The camera is generally pretty responsive, with the zoom reacting quickly to input. The V1's wide lens means you can crop-in for its 4K/60p mode and still maintain a wide-angle view. The full-sensor footage exhibits quite high levels of rolling shutter, so you may have to use the cropped 50/60p mode for capturing shots with lots of movement.

The V1 is a capable option with a useful zoom range, and while its slower sensor may not be the greatest for capturing fast action, it has all the features you'd need to start capturing the world around you.

Read our full PowerShot V1 review

Why you should trust us

This buying guide is based on cameras used and tested by DPReview's editorial team. We don't select a camera until we've used it enough to be confident in recommending it, usually after our extensive review process. The selections are purely a reflection of which cameras we believe to be best: there are no financial incentives for us to select one model or brand over another.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Updated: July 8th, 2025

Whether you're just sharing clips with friends or you're launching an online on-camera career, vlogging matters. And there's a point at which your smartphone may not give you the look, control, or flexibility you're after. With 180-degree selfie screens, wide-angle lenses, microphone inputs and great video quality, more and more dedicated cameras are catering to people who want to take video of themselves and post it online.

The meaning of vlogging has changed over the years, so our picks cover a variety of styles – we'll explain what makes each camera good for vlogging, and what key features each has that make taking video of yourself easier. We've also included videos shot on the cameras in question when we have them to give you an idea of what kind of performance to expect.

Our recommendations:

• Best camera for vlogging on the move: DJI Osmo Pocket 3
• A self-contained vlogging kit: Canon PowerShot V1
• For ambitious vloggers and videographers: Sony ZV-E10 II
• Best high-end vlogging pick: Sony ZV-E1

Best camera for vlogging on the move: DJI Osmo Pocket 3 Photo: Richard Butler $519 at B&H $519 at Amazon $519 at Adorama

DJI’s Osmo Pocket 3 is a stabilized handheld vlogging camera, designed for on-the-move vlogging. It’s built around a type 1 (13.2 x 8.8mm) sensor mounted on a tiny gimbal, meaning it can deliver stabilized footage with smoother motion than any conventional camera or phone.

The small sensor means the Pocket 3 works better in well-lit situations, though a reasonably bright F2.0 lens means it’s usable indoors, too.

It can shoot 4K 16:9 video or, by rotating the screen into the upright position, 3K vertical 9:16 footage. A small joystick lets you control the camera’s movement, and tapping the joystick button flips between the camera pointing toward you or away from you.

Its reliance on contrast-detection autofocus means its focus can be prone to hunting, though its face-detection mode works well enough that this is rarely a problem when talking to the camera.

In addition to the smooth stability of its gimbal and its genuine pocketability, one of the Osmo’s main benefits is that it’s compatible with a series of Bluetooth microphones, meaning you can capture good-quality audio without the need for additional transmitters or receivers.

The video quality isn’t always the highest, and the autofocus can occasionally lead to frustration, but overall the quality and convenience of the Pocket 3 as a package is really hard to beat.

Read our hands-on impressions of the Osmo Pocket 3

A self-contained vlogging kit: Canon PowerShot V1

16-50mm F2.8-4.5 zoom | 22MP 18x12mm Dual Pixel CMOS sensor | 4K/60 with crop

Buy now:

$979 at Amazon.comBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at Canon What we like:

• Attractive output in stills and video
• Versatile wide-angle zoom
• Fan for extended video recording

What we don't:

• Relatively large body
• Full width video has appreciable rolling shutter
• Optimized for vlogging vs stills

The Canon PowerShot V1 is a mid-sized vlogging compact with a relatively large sensor and wide zoom lens.

It offers a competitive suite of vlogging features, a built-in ND filter and good stabilization options. It's also comfortable to hold pointing towards you, and lets you access key settings from the touchscreen. It includes microphone and headphone jacks and a fan for extended recording sessions.

AF performance is good, with reliable tracking AF and effective subject recognition. The camera is generally pretty responsive, with the zoom reacting quickly to input. The V1's wide lens means you can crop-in for its 4K/60p mode and still maintain a wide-angle view. The full-sensor footage exhibits quite high levels of rolling shutter, so you may have to use the cropped 50/60p mode for capturing shots with lots of movement.

The V1 is a capable option with a useful zoom range, and there's a lot to be said for an all-in-one option. You do give up some flexibility for other types of filmmaking, but it should cover most of your bases when it comes to vlogging.

Read our full PowerShot V1 review

We also considered Sony's range of entry-level vlogging cameras with Type 1 sensors, the ZV-1, ZV-1F, and ZV-1 II. The latter is the best pick of the bunch, given its wideangle zoom lens and built-in ND, but it's hard to recommend. Its quality will be slightly better than that of a flagship phone, but if you're going to be carrying an extra gadget around anyway, it's probably best to spend a bit more for a more flexible or capable camera.

For ambitious vloggers and videographers: Sony ZV-E10 II

26MP APS-C sensor | Full-width 4K/24p, 1.1x crop 4K/60p video | Fully articulating screen

Buy now:

$1098 w/ 16-50 at Amazon.com$1098 w/ 16-50 at B&H PhotoBuy at MPB What we like:

• Reliable, accurate autofocus
• Good rolling shutter performance
• Plenty of video options, including 10-bit

What we don't:

• No in-body stabilization
• Doesn't includes Sony's latest and greatest AF
• Not fun for photography

The Sony ZV-E10 II is focused on vlogging, with solid 4K/24p and 4K/60p shooting capabilities, and a suite of features for taking footage of yourself. The ZV-E10 II has an excellent grip, easy-to-hit buttons and a touchscreen that lets you control the most important settings without turning the camera around. The zoom rocker is great for power zoom lenses. Subject tracking autofocus is fast, sticky, and accurate, though it doesn't have all the modes available on other Sony cameras. Product showcase prioritizes items held up in front of your face and has lots of options. Menus are easy to learn and responsive, and battery life is good. The ZV-E10 II pairs useful, video-focused features with excellent hardware, making it an excellent vlogging camera depending on your style. The rolling shutter performance is good, bordering on excellent. The lack of IBIS can make handheld footage look shakey, and electronic stabilization is only useful for stable shots. The built-in microphone is good, and the camera has headphone and mic jacks. The ZV-E10 II brings many – but not all – of the a6700's vlogging features to a more compact and less expensive body. If you can live without IBIS and built-in ND, it's a solid interchangeable lens vlogging camera.

Read our full review of the Sony ZV-E10 II

Potential alternatives?

We also considered Canon's (noticeably cheaper) EOS R50V, but chose the Sony because of its much faster sensor that provides better rolling shutter performance and requires less cropping to shoot at 4K/60. We also looked at Nikon's Z30, but its lack of headphone socket and 10-bit video means we lean towards the Sony. The Nikon Z50II has strong video specs and some of the features the Z30 lacks, such as a headphone jack, but its form factor and heavy crop in its 4K/60 mode make it not particularly well-suited to vlogging.

Best high-end vlogging camera: Sony ZV-E1

Full-width 4K/60p, 120p with minor crop | Auto cropping/framing modes | Subject recognition AF

Buy now:

$2199 at Amazon.com$2198 at Adorama$2198 at B&H Photo What we like:

• 4K footage up to 120p
• Auto-cropped modes aid one-person operation
• Effective autofocus

What we don't:

• Recording times can be short in warm conditions
• 12MP resolution not optimal for stills
• Cropped footage is upscaled to 4K

The Sony ZV-E1 is a full-frame E-mount mirrorless camera aimed at vloggers and ambitious content creators.

It has pretty much everything a vlogger would need: Sony's class-leading autofocus, a front tally light, a stabilized sensor, 4K/60 with no crop and excellent rolling shutter performance. It also has features that make shooting alone easier, such as its auto framing mode that dynamically zooms in on the subject in a frame, much like a cameraperson would, and the product showcase mode that overrides the face detection AF when you're clearly trying to show the camera something.

The ZV-E1 has two command dials, both on the back of the camera, which makes manual video control a little fiddly, there's a touchscreen-led interface to encourage more automated presenter/operator working, though. The ZV-E1's subject recognition system is highly reliable. The lack of a fan means it's much more susceptible to overheating than the otherwise similar FX3. It adds automated modes that crop and follow a recognized subject around the frame, adding dynamism to single-operator footage. "The ZV-E1 has some clever automated modes but can be a bit fiddly to operate. It's hard to match the power for the price, though" The camera's 4K footage (up to 120p) is detailed with relatively little rolling shutter, but you'll want to use the strongest level of image stabilization (with crop) for hand-held shooting as it's a little juddery in less intensive modes. The ZV-E1 tries to marry the capability of the FX3 cinema camera with automated ease-of-use, but can end up being quite confusing in the auto modes and quite fiddly if you try to take a more hands-on approach. It's hard to match the power for the price, though.

Read our initial review of the Sony ZV-E1

A cheaper competitor

If your budget doesn't quite stretch as far as the ZV-E1 requires, the Panasonic S9 may be a decent option that costs around $1000 less. It, too, has a stabilized, full-frame sensor, though it lacks a headphone jack and some of the vlogging-specific features Sony includes. While its sensor can shoot at higher-than-4K resolutions for more flexibility in post, its slower readout means you'll have to deal with a crop when shooting 4K/60, and will have to be aware of rolling shutter.

Buy now:

$1799 w/ 18-40mm at Amazon.com$1498 at Adorama$1798 w/ 18-40mm at B&H Photo Why you should trust us

This buying guide is based on cameras used and tested by DPReview's editorial team. We don't select a camera until we've used it enough to be confident in recommending it, usually after our extensive review process. The selections are purely a reflection of which cameras we believe to be best: there are no financial incentives for us to select one model or brand over another.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission. Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. 84%Overall scoreJump to conclusion

Product images by Mitchell Clark / Richard Butler

The Canon PowerShot V1 is a vlogging compact built around a large sensor and a 16-50mm equivalent zoom lens. Despite its focus on video, which extends to a cooling fan for extended capture periods, its similarity to the PowerShot G1 series of large-sensor enthusiast compacts has caught the attention of photographers.

Key features:

• 22MP Type 1.4 (18.4 x 12.3mm) Dual Pixel AF CMOS sensor
• 16-50mm equiv. F2.8-4.5 zoom lens with 3EV ND filter
• Full-width 4K up to 30p from 5.7K capture
• 4K/60p from a 1.4x crop
• Up to 30 fps stills capture in e-shutter mode
• Cooling fan for extended video recording
• Wired or wireless video streaming
• Multi-function hotshoe for flash or audio accessories
• Fully-articulated rear touchscreen
• Headphone and mic sockets

The Canon PowerShot V1 was originally announced as costing $899 in the US. Elsewhere, pricing was set at €999 and £959, including VAT. However, the US price has subsequently risen to $979.

Index:

• What's new
• Body and handling
• In use: for vlogging
• In use: for photography
• Image quality
• Conclusion
• Sample gallery
• Specifications

Buy now:

$979 at Amazon.comBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at Canon What's new

The V1 is Canon's first high-end vlogging compact, with a multi-module mic on top and a cooling fan to extend its recording duration. But, while its wide-angle lens points at its ambitions to help self-filming social mediaists, its use of a roughly-four-thirds-sized sensor and a zoom lens can't help but evoke the more stills-focused PowerShot G1 X cameras.

The sensor's specs are a match for using a similarly sized chunk of the EOS R7's chip. Both need to crop into the same size of their sensor to deliver 4K/60, but the smaller 'full image' region on the V1 means there different between the full-width and cropped areas are much less dramatic than was the case with the R7.

It's built around a 16-50mm equivalent F2.8-5.6 stabilized lens with a leaf shutter that appears to operate using an electronic first curtain shutter, limiting its maximum flash sync speed to (a still very respectable) 1/400 sec. There's a built-in 3EV ND filter to help you keep to video-friendly shutter speeds in bright light. It can be set to activate automatically in video mode and can be manually engaged when shooting stills.

It has a built-in fan and fully articulating touchscreen but there's no built-in flash or electronic viewfinder, nor the option to fit one.

Body and handling

The degree to which the V1 has prioritized vlogging becomes apparent when you pick it up: the body is surprisingly deep, as a result of the fan-cooled chamber at the back of the camera, and the grip is unexpectedly shallow.

Just as we saw with the EOS R50V, the grip is designed so that it's easy to hold the camera facing towards you, but with less to hold onto if you're behind it. The body feels pleasantly dense and solid, with the grippy rubber coating making it feel secure in the hand. But while it works pretty well from both sides of the lens, it's not as well optimized for conventional hand holding as a dedicated photo camera.

All the camera's control points are quite small, though, with the shutter button, its surrounding zoom lever and the exposure mode dial all looking as if they've shrunk in the wash. The little power button gets partially obscured if you fit the included mic wind screen into place.

One of the principal control points is the free-rotating dial around the lens. Its default function varies, depending on your mode (controlling aperture value in Av mode, for instance). The direction of its operation can be reversed, if you find that easier, when facing the camera.

There's also a small, rather fiddly dial around the four-way controller on the back of the camera. Its function can't be changed directly, but if you assign the front dial to a specific function, such as Exposure Comp or ISO, it takes on the function that the front dial would otherwise do.

The PowerShot V1 has both Mic and Headphone sockets, placed on the right flank, meaning they can't clash with the articulated screen mounted on the other side of the camera.

Below these are an USB-C and Micro HDMI port.

There are two small camera strap points on either side of the body: a protruding lug on one side, a recessed bar on the other. Both are quite small, which will limit your choice of neck or wrist straps to those with very thin cords.

Battery

The V1 uses the relatively small LP-E17 battery, from which it achieves a rating of 340 shots per charge (400 in power saving mode). These numbers shouldn't be taken literally, as it's common to get twice the rated number, depending on your shooting style. But the numbers are broadly comparable between cameras and a rating of around 350 shots per charge will usually allow you to shoot for a good amount of time without having to worry about it.

The V1 can be charged over USB and, with a powerful enough USB PD power source, can record or stream video and charge, simultaneously (you'll need a battery in the camera to do this, though).

Memory cards

We found the V1 could be a little temperamental with SD cards. In principle, its highest video rate is the cropped 4K/60 mode, which uses a 230 Mbps average bit rate. This is just under 30MB/s so should be safely accommodated by a memory card with U3 or V30 speed rating (the fastest class of UHS I cards). In practice, we found we also needed to use the low-level format option in the camera if we wanted it to work reliably. We'd strongly recommend doing this if you notice that the V1 is taking a long time to write video or Raw files to the card.

In use: for vlogging

The PowerShot V1 essentially uses a cropped version of the sensor from the EOS R7. This means it can deliver oversampled 4K video from its full width at up to 30p but has to crop-in to a roughly native 4K region of the sensor to deliver 60p.

Lens IS On / Off Digital IS On Digital IS Enhanced Subj. track IS 4K up to 30p 1.00 1.11x 1.43x 1.43x 4K 50/60 1.43x – – –

It also means its rolling shutter numbers are proportionate to those of the EOS R7: a fraction faster because it's using a smaller region of the sensor, but not dramatically different.

Interestingly, the rolling shutter rate in the standard 4K modes is slower than the mode used for whole-image electronic shutter in stills (23.4ms), we're not sure why this is.

Stabilization Off Digital IS On Enhanced / Subj. track IS 4K up to 30p 26.3ms 23.7ms 18.4ms 4K 50/60 15.9ms – –

All the 4K/24 and 30 modes are taken from the same readout mode: the decreased rolling shutter is accounted for entirely by the degree to which they're cropped. The 60p mode, meanwhile, is actually being read faster.

We generally consider rolling shutter rates below 25ms to be acceptable, those below 20ms to be good and those below 15ms to be good. With the Powershot V1, if you're moving the camera it's well worth applying at least some degree of digital IS to make your footage smoother and reduce the rolling shutter rate a little. There's a noise and detail penalty to be paid as you crop in, but it's probably a worthwhile compromise.

The 4K/60 options disappear from the menu if you have any form of Digital IS engaged, which is worth being conscious of.

In terms of their intended effect, we found both IS modes to be very effective, with the basic digital IS letting you maintain a fairly steady handheld shot and 'Enhanced' doing a good job of handling more significant motion. There's also a subject recognition IS mode that applies a large crop so that it has freedom to move the capture area around to maintain your chosen composition, relative to a recognized subject.

We were also pleasantly surprised by the internal mics. The sound isn't as good as using an external mic but it's better than we've become used to, with these vlogging cameras.

In general, the V1 makes video capture fairly simple but there are a few quirks. 'Close-up Demo' mode, which over-rides face detection AF when you hold something in front of the camera is only available as a 'Scene' mode, so you suddenly lose control over things like mic volume and exposure. The same is true if you want to use the camera's skin-smoothing effect.

While we understand Canon wanting to make these functions easy to access, the fact you can only use them in a very limiting, highly automated manner means you lose any control over audio and white balance. To be truly useful, it should be available as an AF option for experienced users as well as a Scene mode for beginners.

In use, for photography

Although conceptually the V1 looks a lot like a wide-angle successor to the PowerShot G1 X series, its increased focus on vlogging seriously undermines its usability as an enthusiast compact.

The lack of a clicking front dial and the awkwardness of operating the small rear dial means it's not a camera that gives effortless access to, say, aperture and exposure comp. This is the same thing that stopped Sony's RX100 series from shining as enthusiast compacts, and meant instead they worked better as (superlative) point-and-shoots. The V1's added bulk means it doesn't rate so highly in that regard, either.

Add to this the insubstantial hand grip and slightly bulky body and you end up with a camera that, on paper, appears to have the capabilities of a high-quality wide-angle compact for photographers but that never delivers on the experience. The small buttons and awkward dials (of which only the front one can be customized), mean taking direct control is more fiddly than would be ideal.

Also worth noting is that you'll need to assign one of the camera's buttons if you want to position the AF point with anything other than the touchscreen.

The large sensor and ultrawide lens can deliver the goods.

Canon PowerShot V1 @ 16mm | F2.8 | 1/250 sec | ISO 100
Photo: Richard Butler

On the plus side, the V1 has a hot shoe, compatible with newer flashes or with older ones if you buy an adapter. Despite having a leaf shutter, the V1 has the same 1/400 sec flash sync speed limit as the G1 X III with external flashes: still good but not as flexible as being able to sync all the way up to 1/2000 sec.

Even those photographers who can live without a viewfinder or the capacity to add one are likely to find themselves fighting against the V1 to get the most out of it, despite all the promise. For some people, that wide range and large sensor, unmatched by any other compact, will make it worthwhile. But if you've used a previous G-X model, you'll be constantly reminded of what's been taken away.

This isn't the camera's intent, of course, but it's disappointing that a camera that sounds like it should double as a pretty adept photographers' compact isn't more engaging to use as one.

Image quality

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors and detail types you'll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes to see the effect of different lighting conditions.

Image ComparisonThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

As we suspected, the pixel-level noise performance of the V1 is very similar to that of the EOS R7, whose sensor is very similar, but with a consequent disadvantage of around half a stop, when compared at the whole-image level, because of its smaller active sensor area.

This puts the V1 comfortably ahead of Sony's ZV-1 Mark II vlogging compact, but behind its ZV-E10 II mirrorless vlogging camera.

Detail levels in the JPEG are good, but the Raw results suggest it's having to apply a fair amount of sharpening and contrast to get the results it's delivering.

Wide-angle performance:

Our studio scene isn't intended as a lens test chart but we thought it'd be interesting to see how it performs at its widest setting, too.

Canon PowerShot V1 @ 16mm equiv | F5.6 | 1/40 | ISO 100

Click here to download the accompanying Raw file.

As we'd expect of such a small lens delivering an ultrawide field of view in front of a relatively large sensor, its design includes a significant amount of digital correction of geometric distortion.

However, despite producing an alarming-looking projection if you hack away that element of the lens design, the final results (derived from around 80% of the sensor area) are surprisingly good.

It's quite difficult to precisely align such a wide lens with our chart, which can undermine consistency between the four corners, yet despite this potential source of error, all four corners look pretty detailed. The far extremes get distinctly blurry but we were quite impressed by the performance for a retractable zoom that goes this wide.

And, of course, it's less of a concern for vloggers, where those extreme corners won't be used for the 16:9 output footage.

Conclusion Pros Cons

• Very good image quality
• Ultra-wide lens performs well
• Lens still wide even with 4K 50 or 60p crop
• Effective IS options
• Grip comparatively effective, both sides of the camera
• Strong feature set including ND filter, headphone socket, subject tracking stabilization and C-Log3 options
• Built-in mics aren't bad, wind-screen comes in the box
• Fan adds reassurance when recording video for longer periods

• Relatively high rolling shutter figures
• 'Close-up' Demo mode offers very little control
• Grip not optimized for photography
• Fewer photo controls than G1 X cameras
• Clickless control dial not ideal for discrete parameters
• Fan adds bulk to camera
• Small strap lugs limit wrist/neck strap options
• Can be somewhat picky about memory cards
• Smartphone App requires login

The Canon PowerShot V1 is an interesting addition to the vlogging market, with a larger sensor and wider lens than any of the currently available models. And, for now at least, it's also the closest we have to an ultra-wide-angle compact for photography. It's significantly better at one than the other.

As a vlogging camera the V1 is pretty capable, offering a good selection of features with good video quality and a relatively easy-to-use interface. The internal mics are no substitute for a good external mic but they're not terrible and the wind screen helps for outdoor work. More advanced users can attach their own and take advantage of options like C-Log3 capture, without beginners finding themselves too overwhelmed.

This balance isn't always perfectly struck: the 'close-up demos' scene mode works well for beginners but limits control to the point that users worried about matching footage or controlling the volume of an external mic can't really use it reliably.

As a photo camera, the V1 works less well. It can produce excellent images and its uniquely wide-angle lens will make it worth perservering with, for some photographers. But the small and rather limited controls mean it's not as fun or engaging a camera as the company's previous G-series compacts were.

This isn't the camera's main intent, and if you've been waiting for a compact with an ultrawide lens, that may be worth working 'round. But it's worth being aware that you may feel that you're having to coax something out of the camera it wasn't particularly designed to do.

As a vlogging camera its range of capabilities and ability to accommodate a range of users and vlogging styles earns it our silver award. It's a powerful piece of kit for getting your message out to the world.

Scoring

Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category. Click here to learn about what these numbers mean.

Canon PowerShot V1Category: Enthusiast Large Sensor Compact CameraBuild qualityErgonomics & handlingFeaturesMetering & focus accuracyImage quality (raw)Image quality (jpeg)Low light / high ISO performanceViewfinder / screen ratingOpticsPerformanceMovie / video modeConnectivityValuePoorExcellentConclusionThe PowerShot V1 is a capable vlogging tool that will support a wide range of vloggers and a wide range of vlogging styles. It's less compelling just for photos, but if you plan primarily to shoot video, it's pretty powerful.Good forVlogging of all typesNot so good forPhoto-only shooters84%Overall scoreRegularScoreCompareWidget({"mainElementId":"scoringWidget","mainProduct":"canon_v1","scoringSchema":{"id":"SLRs","variables":[{"id":"BuildQuality"},{"id":"ErgonomicsAndHandling"},{"id":"Features"},{"id":"MeteringAndFocusAccuracy"},{"id":"QualityRaw"},{"id":"QualityJpeg"},{"id":"LowLightHighISO"},{"id":"ViewfinderScreenRating"},{"id":"Optics"},{"id":"Performance"},{"id":"Movie"},{"id":"Connectivity"},{"id":"Value"}],"categories":[{"id":"EntryLevel","label":"Entry Level Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Entry Level"},{"id":"MidRange","label":"Mid Range Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Mid Level"},{"id":"EntryLevelFullFrame","label":"Entry Level Full Frame Camera","shortLabel":"Entry Level Full Frame"},{"id":"MidRangeFullFrame","label":"Mid Range Full Frame Camera","shortLabel":"Mid Range Full Frame"},{"id":"SemiProfessional","label":"Semi-professional Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Semi-professional"},{"id":"SemiProfessionalFullFrame","label":"Semi-professional Full Frame Camera","shortLabel":"Semi-professional Full Frame"},{"id":"Professional","label":" Professional Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR","shortLabel":"Professional"},{"id":"LargeSensorCompactEntry","label":"Entry Level Large Sensor Compact Camera","shortLabel":"Entry Level Large Sensor Compact"},{"id":"LargeSensorCompactEnthusiast","label":"Enthusiast Large Sensor Compact Camera","shortLabel":"Enthusiast Large Sensor Compact"},{"id":"VideoCamera","label":"Video Camera","shortLabel":"Video Camera"}]},"helpText":"Choose one or more cameras from the drop-down menu, then roll your mouse over the names to see how their scores compare to the camera on review."}) Compared to its peers

The PowerShot V1's most obvious peers are two of Sony's ZV series of vlogging cameras.

The Sony ZV-1 Mark II is the most direct competitor, with is 18-50mm equivalent lens. That lens has an F1.8-4.0 maximum aperture, which sounds impressive next to the V1's F2.8-5.6 zoom, but if you factor-in sensor size, the difference is much less pronounced. The V1 is likely to perform around a third of a stop less well in low light and in terms of depth-of-field at the wide end, and around two thirds of a stop better at the long end. Its larger sensor should give it the edge in good light.

The Sony is a lot smaller than the Canon, its autofocus that bit more reliable and its 'product showcase' mode is more readily accessible and controlable. Conversely, we found the Canon's stabilization to be more effective than the Sony's, giving smoother output and being less prone to the distracting grab-and-release effect if you intentionally pan. The Canon also has a 4K/60 option, that the Sony lacks, making it our choice overall.

And, despite our reservations about the V1 as a photographers' compact, its larger sensor and wider lens make it a more appealing option, despite its significantly greater size.

The other real rival is Sony's ZV-E10 Mark II, a mirrorless camera built around an APS-C sensor. It's an appreciably larger sensor that's much faster to read out, and it has the same advantages in terms of autofocus. Its interchangeable lens design gives you more flexibility overall but means you end up with a larger camera/lens combination and a larger bill, as soon as you add something like the Sony 10-20mm F4 PZ G power zoom to approximately match the V1's range. Again, the V1 looks like a better-judged package, unless you specifically need an unusual lens, the attractive S-Cinetone mode or will benefit from its less-cropped, higher quality 4K/60 capability.

As a stills camera the V1 also out-points the ZV-E10 II, as Sony has omitted to include a mechanical shutter or physical stabilization: features you need to move up to the a6700 to gain.

Much as we were left cold by the V1 as an enthusiast compact, it is essentially your only option if you're looking for something plausibly pocketable with decent image quality and an ultrawide lens, it's essentially the best option purely as a consequence of being your only option.

Buy now:

$979 at Amazon.comBuy at B&H PhotoBuy at Canon Sample gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission. Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. 90%Overall scoreJump to conclusion

Product Photos: Richard Butler

The Fujifilm GFX100RF is a 100-megapixel medium format digital camera with a fixed 28mm equivalent F4 lens.

Key features

• 102MP Medium format (44 x 33 mm) BSI CMOS sensor
• 35mm (28mm equiv) F4 lens w/ leaf shutter
• 5.76M dot OLED EVF
• Weather sealed when using included filter ring and filter
• Subject recognition autofocus
• Aspect ratio dial
• 3.2" tilting rear touchscreen
• 4K video up to 30fps
• Built-in 4EV ND filter
• 14 film simulations

The GFX100RF has a recommended price of $4899. It comes in either black or black and silver, and includes a braided strap, filter ring, filter and a color-matched square lens hood.

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.comBuy at AdoramaBuy at B&H Photo Index:

• What's new
• How it compares
• Body and handling
• Image Quality
• Autofocus
• In Use
• Conclusion
• Sample gallery
• Specifications
• Press Release

What's New Fixed lens medium format body

The GFX100RF occupies a new space in Fujifilm's lineup and comes with a new design. It's essentially the long-rumored 'medium format X100,' in that it takes the formula of classic styling, direct controls and a wideangle prime lens permanently mounted on the front.

Don't take the rangefinder implications of the letters 'RF' too seriously though: this is essentially the world's most ambitious compact camera, lacking not just a rangefinder but also the X100/X-Pro hybrid viewfinder that gives the appearance of a classic rangefinder camera. Instead, the RF's EVF is a relatively standard 5.76M dot affair located in the top left corner of the back of the camera.

While the body is nowhere near as large as the interchangeable lens GFX cameras, it still has a lot of presence. You'll never forget that you have it on you and would be hard-pressed to fit it into a pocket. That's especially true when it's fitted with the included square lens hood, which adds style points but has to be mounted on the adapter ring, adding a substantial amount of depth, substituting flair for flare.

Like the X100VI, the GFX100RF can be weather-sealed with an adapter ring and filter, though this too makes it bulkier. The hood can still be fitted to the adapter ring when the filter is installed.

The fixed lens

Fujifilm says it went with a 28mm equivalent lens to make the camera as compact as possible while also letting users shoot with (to a point) lower shutter speeds without the aid of IBIS or optical stabilization. That ability, which largely depends on how still your hands and subject are, will come in handy given the lens's relatively slow F4 (F3.2 equiv) aperture.

The lens has a minimum focus distance of 20cm (7.9") and can accept 49mm filters when fitted with its adapter ring. Its being fixed also allows for the provision of a leaf shutter, letting the GF to sync with flashes up to 1/2000 (technically, it can sync all the way up to 1/4000, but you risk cutting off some of the flashes' burst using such a brief exposure).

Aspect ratio dial

Looking at the back of the camera, the first thing that sticks out is the large dial above the screen. Its sole purpose is to let you apply various crops to your image, changing your JPEG's aspect ratio – and reducing how much of the sensor's area and resolution you're using.

There are nine options to choose from, and the camera gives you a few ways to preview your chosen aspect ratio. It can use black borders, a bounding box or raise the opacity of the portions of the image that will be cut off.

Amusingly, the label for the XPan-emulating 65:24 aspect ratio is a bit too wide for the window; you can see the labels for neighboring aspect ratios peeking through.

There's also a "C" setting that lets you control the aspect ratio via one of the camera's command dials or the menus. If you decide you're unhappy with the crop after the fact, you can use the in-camera Raw reprocessing feature to change the aspect ratio, assuming you've been shooting in Raw + JPEG, as the camera maintains the full sensor Raw file and saves the intended crop as metadata.

Crop zoom 28mm equiv. 35mm equiv. 50mm equiv. 63mm equiv. GFX100RF | F9 | ISO 80 | 1/125

Photos: Mitchell Clark

In addition to its choice of aspect ratio crops, the GFX100RF has a crop mode that punches in to give the impression of using a longer lens. You physically control the crop using a toggle switch situated under the power switch and front control dial.

As always, cropping reduces the area of the sensor being used, meaning a reduction in resolution and of total light capture. This has a consequent reduction in tonal quality if viewed at the same scale as full-sensor images. The table below indicates the equivalent focal length that each of the crops gives, both with reference to the camera's 44 x 33mm sensor, which is how the camera reports the 'focal lengths' of the crops, and in terms of their full-frame equivalents for reference.

In 44x33 terms In 'full-frame' terms Effective focal length Crop Equivalent focal length
(vs full-frame) Crop factor Pixel count
(4:3) 35mm 1.00x 28mm equiv. 0.79x 102 MP 45mm 1.29x 35mm equiv. 1.00x 62 MP 63mm 1.81x 50mm equiv. 1.42x 31 MP 80mm 2.28x 63mm equiv. 1.79x 20 MP

As you can see, hitting the lever once essentially turns the camera into a "full-frame" camera with a 35mm F4 equiv lens, before dropping down to nearer APS-C and Four Thirds image quality.

As with the aspect ratio crops, the zoom is only applied to the JPEG, leaving your Raw untouched. You also have the same preview options, as well as the ability to have your chosen crop fill the screen, but doing so won't give you any context to what's outside of your frame.

You can remove the crop using the in-camera Raw reprocessing feature, though you can't select a different crop in-camera: it's the crop you shot the image with or the full sensor, only.

How it compares

The fixed-lens camera market is small but has several strong competitors, especially if you're willing to spend this much money on one. Leica's Q3, with its high-resolution full-frame sensor and 28mm focal length, is the most obvious point of comparison, but Fujifilm's X100VI is also a potential competitor for those who prefer the 35mm field of view or want a substantially smaller, less expensive option.

We've also included the Hasselblad X2D, which has a similar sensor but with an interchangeable lens mount. The Fujifilm GFX 100 S II is perhaps a more direct competitor in both specs and price, but the Hasselblad's size and use of leaf shutter lenses prompted us to include it instead.

Fujifilm GFX100RF Leica Q3 Fujifilm X100VI Hasselblad X2D MSRP $4899 $6295 $1599 $8,199 Sensor 102MP medium format (Bayer) 60MP full-frame (Bayer) 40MP APS-C
(X-Trans) 100MP medium format (Bayer) Lens (full-frame equiv.) 28mm F3.1 28mm F1.7 35mm F3.1 Interchangeable - Hasselblad X mount Stabilization? No Optical IBIS / Optical IBIS Built-in ND? 4EV No 4EV No Weather sealing With included filter Yes With optional filter No Viewfinder res / mag 5.76M dot
0.84x equiv
OLED
electronic 5.76M dot
0.79x equiv
OLED
electronic 3.69M dot
0.66x equiv
OLED
electronic / optical 5.76M dot
1.00x equiv
OLED
electronic Video capture 4K/30p 8K/30p
4K/60p 6.2K/30p
4K/60p None Rear screen 3.2" tilting

3" tilting

3" tilting 3.6" tilting Storage formats 2x UHS-II SD,
external SSD 1x UHS-II SD 1x UHS-1 SD 1TB internal, CFexpress Type B Flash sync speed 1/4000 s 1/2000 s 1/4000 s up to 1/4000 s* Battery life
(CIPA) 820 shots 350 shots 420 shots 420 shots Dimensions 134 x 90 x 77mm 130 x 80 x 93mm 128 x 75 x 55 mm 149 x 106 x 75mm Weight 735g (25.9oz) 743g (26.2oz) 521g (18.4oz) 895g (31.6oz) *Flash sync speed is lens-dependent

The GFX100RF's sensor may appear to be in a class above many of its fixed-lens peers, and in good light, we'd expect its larger sensor to give it a proportionate image quality advantage.

But it's worth considering raw light-gathering ability if low-light shooting is a big concern for you. Wide-open, the Q3's much faster lens gives it a 1.7EV potential advantage despite its smaller sensor, and there are lenses substantially faster than F4 available for the X2D (though they do come at significant expense). Even the APS-C-equipped X100VI* can gather a bit more light per-whole-image than the GFX can in its 35mm crop mode.

While the difference in focal length is a deal-breaker for some photographers, those who like 35mm equiv may find that Fujifilm's smaller offering provides a more engaging shooting experience thanks to its standout hybrid viewfinder – the GFX100RF, meanwhile, has a good but otherwise standard EVF. It's also the only camera in this lineup without any form of stabilization, which further reduces its capability as light level drops, even if you take into account the reduced risk of shake from its leaf shutter.

*It's impossible to mention the X100VI without acknowledging that, over a year after its announcement, it's still extremely hard to get. Persistent stock issues mean you'll have to be patient or willing to pay a reseller a substantial premium over MSRP if you want one.

Body and Handling

The GFX100RF is relatively wide and boxy, though a small grip helps make it easier to hold. While it's undoubtedly large for a fixed-lens camera, it's not particularly heavy, making it easy to tote around all day.

From the top, the family resemblance to the X100VI is obvious. Though that top plate sits on an appreciably larger camera.

The GFX100RF is brimming with controls. There are two programmable command dials: a knurled barrel on the front and a conventional dial in the back, with the rear one being clickable to cycle through functions. There's also a dedicated exposure compensation dial and autofocus mode control.

Shutter speed and ISO control share a dial, with the latter requiring you to pull up on the bezel before rotating. The lens has an aperture ring, which includes an automatic setting and two opposed nubs that make it easy to turn.

On the left of this shot, top-to-bottom are the camera's power switch, the barrel-style front command dial and the 'digital teleconverter' toggle at the bottom. To the right is the front plate lever (designed to look like the self-time control on a film camera). This can be flicked in either direction to access two functions or held (for just a bit too long) in either direction to access two more.

Also fixed in function are the zoom toggle on the front and the aspect ratio dial; neither can be reconfigured. The lever on the front plate, however, is entirely customizable, and you can assign up to four functions to it, as it can differentiate between a flick and a pull and hold. The latter action takes around three seconds to activate. It also has a customizable button in the center.

The Q button, which by default brings up a customizable, on-screen control panel, is on the edge of the grip, which makes it difficult to press without adjusting your hand. This sort of placement makes a bit of sense on smaller cameras where there's nowhere else to put it, but it's baffling on a camera with so much room on the back. Also hard to hit while using the camera is the small, unlabeled button on the top plate right above the exposure compensation dial, which can be customized. As with many of Fujifilm's cameras, you can also have up to four settings that are controllable by swiping up, down, left or right on the touchscreen.

You can also use the touchscreen to position the autofocus point, though the camera has a dedicated joystick for that purpose.

The dual UHS-II SD card slots live on the right-hand side of the camera, while a door on the left opens up to reveal headphone and microphone sockets, the USB-C port, and a micro-HDMI port.

Display and EVF

The GFX100RF has a two-way tilting screen, which can help when you're trying to compose shots at waist level or above your head. The lack of side-to-side tilting does limit your options somewhat, though this was likely another concession to making the camera as compact as possible.

It's easy to wish that Fujifilm had gone with the hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder found on the X-100 and X-Pro series; it would enhance the rangefinder aesthetic and could make using the camera more engaging. One of the senior planners for GFX told us Fujifilm went with a 5.76M dot, 0.84x equiv. EVF instead because the more complicated hybrid viewfinder couldn't provide as much magnification and didn't really work when using the digital teleconverter feature – depending on how far you punch in, you'd be composing through some very small guidelines.

The EVF we did get is large, bright and easy to compose through. It's hard to complain about the experience it provides.

Battery

The GFX100RF uses the 16Wh NP-W235 battery, the same that powers cameras like the GFX 100 II or X-T5. It's rated to get 820 shots in its normal mode, which is a frankly stunning performance. We consider ratings – which rarely reflect the number of shots most people get but rather act as a standard benchmark to measure cameras against each other – of around 400 shots or more to be sufficient for a heavy weekend of shooting, and the GFX100RF almost doubles that figure.

Image Quality

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors and detail types you'll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes to see the effect of different lighting conditions.

Image ComparisonThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

We'll get into the nerdy details in a second, but a top-level summary is that the GFX100RF has superb image quality that's downright incredible once you consider its size and weight. We've long been impressed with what this sensor can do, and Fujifilm's work on getting great JPEGs out of it is paying dividends now that it's in a camera aimed at more casual and spontaneous styles of photography.

Unsurprisingly, the GFX100RF's Raws capture noticeably more detail than the 61MP full-frame sensor used in the Q3, Leica's high-end large sensor compact, and substantially more than the Fujifilm X100VI's 40MP APS-C sensor. The camera's JPEG engine does a good job of preserving those details.

The lens can't match the $2700 dedicated Macro lens we used for the GFX100 but the JPEG processing does its best to make up for the difference.

Those trends continue in low-light, and looking at high-ISO Raws noise performance follows sensor size. The JPEG engine does a decent job of not blurring away details when applying noise reduction.

Dynamic Range

The GFX100RF has excellent dynamic range performance at its base ISO of 80; it adds very little read noise to the image, meaning there's little difference in images shot at the same exposure but different ISOs, and then brightened to match each other in post. Its files also provide plenty of room to raise shadows, which will help if you want to shoot at a lower exposure to protect highlights.

The PDAF banding we saw in our original DR tests for the GFX 100 doesn't appear in our tests for the GFX100RF: there are reports it was also fixed on the GFX 100 via software update.

Lens Performance

Our studio test scene isn't designed to test lenses, but it can still tell us something about some aspects of performance. The 28mm equiv lens on the GFX100RF has to be shot quite close-up, but it's still around 30x the focal length away from the chart, so it should be a reasonable representation of real-world performance. Our tests are shot at F5.6 to maintain a reasonable depth-of-field and across-frame-consistency, but the F4/F5.6 comparisons we've shot show little difference in corner performance (it's vignetting, rather than sharpness differences, that has more of an impact).

With all of that said, the lens performs well under these conditions. It's quite sharp in the center. It performs reasonably well out to the corners, where there's some light falloff visible in the Raws (which the JPEG engine does a good job of correcting). While the original GFX100, paired with Fujifilm's 120mm F4 macro, renders our scene more uniformly and sharply, that lens alone weighs more than an entire GFX100RF.

At F5.6, chromatic aberration also seems well-controlled compared to the X100VI's lens.

In our out-of-studio testing, we didn't find the lens to be a limiting factor to our image quality. While we certainly shot images that we felt could have been sharper given the conditions, it's the lack of stabilization that kept the sensor from living up to its full potential, not the lens.

Autofocus GFX100RF | 1/125 sec | F4 | ISO 3200

The GFX100RF uses the same autofocus system found in the rest of Fujifilm's X-Processor 5 cameras, complete with AI-derived detection for a variety of subjects: humans/eyes, animals, birds, cars, planes, bikes/motorcycles and trains.

You can use the touchscreen or the joystick to select a focus point, which can be anywhere from a pinpoint to a wide area. It also lets you store up to three zones with customizable widths and heights. When you're in AF-C mode, you get a medium-sized point that attempts to track your selected target as it or the camera moves. It also supports tap-to-track via the touchscreen.

The camera is usually good at respecting your chosen focus point, even when there's a subject it recognizes in the frame. However, we found that, on some occasions, it was more liable than other Fujifilm cameras to jump to a subject that was relatively far away from the selected focus point, which could force you to disengage subject detection for certain compositions.

Like the rest of Fujifilm's cameras in this generation, the GFX100RF's human subject detection mode is separate from the rest of its subject detection modes, where most other camera systems have humans listed as a subject. That means if you want to set a custom button to activate subject detection, you have to decide whether you want it to be for faces or one of the other modes, or devote two buttons to it.

Autofocus Performance

We found the autofocusing system to be generally reliable for the type of shooting the GFX100RF is suited for: street scenes, landscapes (both natural and urban), portraits and the like. While the lens isn't sluggish to focus, we also wouldn't try to use it to shoot a subject moving quickly through the focal plane.

As with Fujifilm's other cameras with its fifth-gen processor, the GFX100RF's tracking isn't as sticky as that of other brands; it can occasionally lose subjects or fail to lock on to them, especially if they're moving quickly. In most situations, though, it worked well enough for track-and-recompose shooting.

In Use

Despite its large-for-a-compact size, the GFX100RF isn't much of a burden to carry along. It's not like a Ricoh GR or Fujifilm X100 – a nearly pocketable camera that you'd take with you every day just in case you ran into something photogenic – but it's not so bulky that you'd hesitate to grab it if you're headed off to do something interesting.

While the front control dial is aesthetically pleasing, we did find it could be a bit hard to use, despite its aggressive knurling. Unlike traditional control dials, it's flush with the grip, which can make it a little difficult to find and to use smoothly. And if you miss it, there's a good chance you'll accidentally flick the fixed-purpose "digital teleconverter" toggle instead.

Whether you'll find that toggle useful mostly depends on how much you value image quality versus convenience. It's unavoidable that every time you punch in, you're throwing away more and more of the light-gathering ability and resolution that justify the camera's size and price – that's especially true if you use it in conjunction with the aspect ratio dial.

Aspect ratio 28mm equiv. 35mm equiv. 50mm equiv. 63mm equiv. 4:3 102MP
44x33mm 62MP
34x26mm 31MP
24x18mm 20MP
19x14mm

3:2

90MP
44x29mm 55MP
34x23mm 28MP
24x16mm 17MP
19x13mm 16:9 76MP
44x25mm 46MP
34x19mm 23MP
24x14mm 15MP
19x11mm

65:24

50MP
44x16mm 30MP
34x13mm 15MP
24x9mm 10MP
19x7mm 17:6 48MP
44x16mm 29MP
34x12mm 15MP
24x9mm 9MP
19x7mm 3:4 57MP
25x33mm 35MP
19x26mm 18MP
14x18mm 11MP
11x14mm 1:1 76MP
33x33mm 46MP
26x26mm 23MP
18x18mm 15MP
14x14mm 7:6 89MP
38x33mm 54MP
30x26mm 27MP
21x18mm 17MP
17x14mm 5:4 95MP
41x33mm 58MP
32x26mm 29MP
23x18mm 18MP
18x24mm

However, it's also unarguably convenient, and if you're in good light, even the cropped images will be spectacular. I took the camera on vacation with me as my main tool for documenting the trip and used the in-camera crop with abandon (with the knowledge that the camera was still saving the full image as a Raw). I found it was a very natural way to shoot, and I was happy with the image quality of the crops, though I rarely went past the second 50mm equiv. step, which uses an approximately APS-C-sized region of the sensor.

If you pixel-peep there's a fair amount of noise in this image, but I still find it perfectly acceptable at reasonable sizes and viewing distances.

GFX100RF | 1/80 sec | F5 | ISO 6400 | 50mm equiv. crop

There is an argument to be made that using the camera in this manner is wasting its potential. However, you could also say that you're using it for something other than pure image quality; the full capabilities of the sensor are there for when you want them or need them, but you can also use the massive resolution and light-gathering ability to add a bit of flexibility to a fixed-lens camera, in a way that doesn't work as well with a smaller sensor. Which side of that debate you land on will likely be a good indicator of whether you should even consider a GFX100RF.

The aspect ratio dial is also a similar story, in that you'll probably already have a good idea whether it's something you'd be interested in using or not. Playing around with aspect ratios isn't a creative muscle that I've personally built up, and I found myself struggling to find compositions that I thought would look better in, say, 16:9 or 1:1... or, at least, so much better that it was worth using less of the sensor for.

That's not for a lack of effort on Fujifilm's part, though. The experience has clearly been thought through, with the Raws letting you see the chosen crop in post-processing software, while still giving you access to the whole sensor's output, and the different preview modes for both forms of cropping giving you flexibility with how much information you want about what's outside your chosen frame. For those who do appreciate different aspect ratios, it's hard to imagine the GFX100RF's experience leaving them wanting.

Conclusion What we like What we don't

• Superb image quality
• Plenty of tactile controls
• Exceptionally compact for a medium format camera
• Relatively easy to carry around
• Built-in ND and included weather-sealing filter make it more versatile
• Incredible battery life
• Autofocus works well for street and considered photos

• No stabilization limits the extremely capable sensor
• So does the lens
• Familiar EVF gives an unremarkable experience
• Dedicated zoom and aspect ratio controls won't be useful if you want max IQ
• Stylish square lens hood adds substantial bulk

You don't get a camera/lens combo this much smaller than the similarly-specced one to the right without breaking a few eggs.

It may be tempting to see the GFX100RF as a super-sized and super-powered X100VI: a take-everywhere camera that's engaging to use and signals to others that you're someone who's Into Photography. And while it handily achieves that last point (even before you see the massive film format-emulating aspect ratio dial), it doesn't quite live up to the versatility of Fujifilm's smaller cameras.

Every camera has trade-offs, even pricey, premium ones aimed at buyers who expect a lot. The GFX100RF is no different, but it's in the odd position of having two identities: an image quality monster with a massive sensor, and a walkaround, everyday camera that aims to be as compact as possible. Fujifilm has clearly put in a lot of work to balance those competing personas, but with each concession, it narrowed the envelope within which the camera can perform at its best.

To be clear, in good light, the camera produces high-resolution images with incredible detail and tonal quality, the likes of which you simply couldn't get without a much larger kit. But in lower-light scenes, the lack of optical or in-body stabilization and the 28mm equiv. F4 lens make it harder to get the most out of the camera. And when you need to shoot at an odd angle, you may find yourself cursing the screen that only tilts up and down. Ironically, the decisions that make it so compelling to carry with you everywhere you go also make it less well-suited for the situations you may find yourself in when you get there.

Would an X-T5-style three-way tilting screen really have made the camera noticeably larger?

But while image quality may be the GFX100RF's raison d'être, it's also not designed to be a purely practical tool, the way many professional and prosumer cameras are. It's built to be played with, for you to take it everywhere and mess around with how you see the world through its viewfinder via the digital teleconverter and aspect ratio dial. Why else would those features get top billing with large, non-customizable, non-customizable controls?

Ultimately, whether the camera is for you or not will depend on how obsessive you are about image quality and how much you appreciate the things that make the GFX100RF special. Those concerned with maximum image quality in any situation and corner-to-corner sharpness above all may want to look elsewhere, but if you're willing to budge a bit on that, there's a lot to recommend it... provided, of course, that you can afford the asking price and appreciate the field(s) of view its fixed lens provides.

The limitations make it hard to award it a gold, but its combination of image quality, compactness and user experience comfortably earns it a silver.

Buy now:

Buy at Amazon.comBuy at AdoramaBuy at B&H Photo Compared to its peers

In terms of direct competiton, the GFX100RF pretty much stands alone; there aren't any other fixed-lens, medium format digital cameras out there. However, there are other large-sensor enthusiast compact cameras out there (albiet with sensors that aren't quite as large).

The Leica Q3 is the most directly comparable, with its high-resolution full-frame sensor and in-camera cropping feature (not to mention two choices of lens with the Q3 43). It has a substantially faster lens that more than makes up for the sensor's lower light-gathering ability, optical stabilization and a brand name that, for some, will make every time they use it feel special. The GFX100RF doesn't offer the back-to-fundamentals user interface that the Leica Q3 wowed us with; when it comes to menus and controls, the GFX100RF is like pretty much any other Fujifilm camera in that it offers a lot of options spread out through pages and pages of settings. The Leica is substantially pricier, coming in at around $1400 more.

If you're looking for maximum portability from a compact, Fujifilm's X100VI will be a much better fit. In return for dropping down to a much smaller sensor, you get in-body stabilization and a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder that offers a very engaging shooting experience – assuming you can find one, or are willing to pay scalpers' markups.

Sample Gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab. Pre-production Sample Gallery Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission. Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content. Product Photos by Mitchell Clark

The OM System OM-5 II is a Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera that uses the same stabilized 20MP sensor as its predecessor. It also features the same processor as the OM-5, so the list of new features is relatively subtle, but it gains some minor updates that make it feel a bit more modern.

Key Specifications

• 20MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
• 50MP handheld high-res multi-shot mode
• Up to 7.5EV stabilization with Sync IS lenses
• Up to 30fps continuous shooting, configurable pre-capture
• 2.36M-dot 0.68x OLED viewfinder
• IP53 dust and water resistance rating
• USB-C for charging / data transfer
• Updated menu system

The OM-5 II will retail for $1199 body-only, the same as its predecessor, and will be available at "the end of June." It will come in black, silver and a "sand beige" tan.

Buy now:

Buy at AdoramaBuy at B&H Photo Index:

• What's new?
• How it compares
• Body and handling
• Initial Impressions
• Sample gallery
• Specifications
• Press release

What's New USB-C

When the OM-5 launched in 2022, its use of a micro USB port instead of a USB-C one felt like a huge omission, especially given that the European Union was already well on its way to mandating the more modern charging and communication standard. Thankfully, the OM-5 II doesn't repeat that mistake; it uses USB-C for charging and connecting to your computer, where it retains the ability to act as a webcam without any additional software or drivers via the UVC/UAC protocol.

This is mostly an upgrade to the charging experience. You'll still want to use an SD card reader for offloading photos, as the type C port still runs at USB 2.0, less than a tenth the speed of the 5Gbps "SuperSpeed" ports found on a majority of modern cameras.

Updated grip

While the OM-5 II's design is mostly unchanged from its predecessor's, OM System has made the grip a touch larger to help with ergonomics. Compared to the OM-5's, it fills out your hand just a bit more, which helps make it a touch more comfortable and easier to handle.

New menus The OM-5 II's menus, like those on the rest of the company's modern cameras, now look and work a lot like Canon's.

OM System has also brought over its updated menu system from the OM-1 and OM-3, with color-coded sections and tabs. Unlike its predecessor, the camera will try to give you an explanation for why certain items are unavailable instead of leaving you to guess what you need to change to access those features.

You can navigate through the sections using the front dial and switch pages using the rear one, which can be very quick once you get the hang of it. The four-way controller is required for changing your settings; you can use the touchscreen to switch tabs and sections but not to navigate through or adjust the settings themselves.

CP button

OM System has replaced the OM-5's exposure compensation button with the 'CP' button that debuted on the OM-3. It gives you quick access to the camera's myriad computational photography modes; giving it a single press will activate your last-used mode, and if you press and hold it, you can use either command dial to scroll through the various modes and select the one you'd like to use.

The OM-5 II doesn't gain any new computational features compared to its predecessor, which is a bit of a shame since we've found the Live Graduated ND feature included in the higher-end models to be useful in some situations (though that may only be possible because of those cameras' Stacked sensors, which capture images faster, with less risk of rolling shutter). However, the OM-5 II still has a suite of useful computational modes:

OM-5 II OM-1 (II) / OM-3 Multi-shot high-res 50MP handheld / 80MP tripod 50MP handheld / 80MP tripod Live ND 1-4EV 1-6EV / 1-7EV for OM-1 II Live graduated ND — 1-3EV Focus stacking Yes, with select lenses Yes, with select lenses HDR Yes Yes Multiple exposure Yes Yes Live Bulb Yes Yes

All the multi-shot modes are processed in-camera, making them much more convenient to use compared to similar modes from other brands that have to be stitched with desktop software. However, that can take a while for some modes; the most taxing are the handheld high-res shots, which lock up the camera for over 15 seconds; even the progress bar won't move from the EVF to the display or vice versa if you move your eye to or away from the camera.

New color modes Standard Color Profile OM Cinema 1 OM Cinema 2

The OM-5 II includes the two "OM Cinema" color modes from the OM-3, which are made to capture the same level of highlight information as the Log mode but without the extremely low-contrast, low-saturation logic that requires grading. The company says the OM Cinema 1 mode is designed to highlight yellows in the bright parts of your image and blues in the darker areas, while Cinema 2 adds a bit of cyan to the highlights and shadows while lowering contrast.

Light, camera, action

Speaking of video, the OM-5 II now features a red LED in the top right corner on the front of the camera, which acts as a tally light to make it obvious when you're recording video.

A little help

The OM-5 II adds two new assistance features: a night vision mode that boosts the live view's brightness, making it easier to focus and/or compose in dark environments and a handheld assist mode that shows you how stable you're keeping the camera during long exposures. It gives you a target that shows how much you've moved the camera since you started taking the picture. It makes it easier to tell whether your photo will come out blurry since you'll know whether you've moved more than the stabilization system can compensate for.

How it compares

The OM-5 II is mainly focused on people looking to capture their outdoor adventures, a niche that's often serviced by action video cameras. However, there's nothing about its design that precludes it from being a general-use stills camera. As such, we're comparing it to several comparably-priced APS-C cameras that are good for photos (no EVF-less, e-shutter only, single-dial cameras here) but that still include some decent video specs.

OM System OM-5 II Canon EOS R10 Fujifilm X-S20 Nikon Z50II MSRP $1199 $979 $1299 $909 Pixel Count / Sensor Size (Crop Factor) 20MP
Four Thirds (2.0x) 24MP
APS-C (1.6x) 26MP
APS-C (1.5x) 21MP
APS-C (1.5x) Image Stabilization 6.5EV
Up to 7.5EV w/ lens coordination Lens only Up to 7.0EV Lens only Max frame rate 6fps mech*
10fps elec with C-AF
30fps elec w/ focus and exposure lock 15fps mech
23fps elec 8fps mech
20fps elec
30fps w/1.25x crop 11fps mech
15fps elec
30fps JPEG-only Pre-burst recording? Yes Yes (Raw Burst mode) Yes Yes, JPEG-only Built-in flash? No Yes Yes Yes Weather sealing IP53 water/dust resistant certified No No Yes AF subject detection types Human / Eye Human / Eye
Animals
Vehicles Human / Eye
Animal
Bird
Cars
Motorcycle / Bike
Airplane
Train Auto
Human / Eye
Animal
Bird
Cars
Motorcycle / Bike
Airplane
Train 10-bit HDR Stills No PQ HEIF No HLG HEIF Viewfinder res. / mag. 2.36M dot
0.68x

2.36M dot
0.59x 2.36M dot
0.62x

2.36M dot
0.68x

Rear screen res. / type

3" 1.04M dot
Fully-articulating 3" 1.04M dot
Fully-articulating 3" 1.84M dot
Fully-articulating 3.2" 1.04M dot
Fully-articulating AF selection Touchscreen / 4-way controller Touchscreen / joystick Touchscreen / joystick Touchscreen / 4-way controller

Video

Full-width UHD/DCI 4K <30p UHD 4K 60p w/ 1.56x crop
Full-width UHD 4K <30p

Up to 6.2K/30p 3:2 (open gate)
UHD/DCI 4K 60p w/ 1.18x crop
Full-width UHD/DCI <30p

UHD 4K 60p w/ 1.5x crop
Full-width UHD 4K <30p 10-bit options OM-Log HDR PQ F-Log/F-Log 2
HLG

N-Raw
N-Log
HLG

Mic / headphone sockets? Yes / No Yes / No Yes / Yes Yes / Yes CIPA Battery rating (LCD/EVF) 310 / – 430 / 260 750 / 750 230 / 220 Weight 418g (14.7oz) 429g (15.1oz) 491g (17.3oz) 550g (19oz) Dimensions 125 x 85 x 52mm
(4.9 x 3.3 x 2.0") 123 x 88 x 83mm
(4.8 x 3.5 x 3.3") 128 x 85 x 65mm
(5.0 x 3.3 x 2.6") 127 x 97 x 67mm
(5 x 3.9 x 2.7")

* - the original OM-5 could shoot at 10fps mechanical, but not with continuous autofocus.

In some ways, OM System sets itself apart at this price point by offering features you'd usually need to pay more for, such as a stabilized sensor and weather sealing. Fujifilm is the only other brand with the former in this range (you'd have to jump up to the $1499 EOS R7 from Canon or $1399 Sony a6700 to find another APS-C camera with it), and OM System is one of only two camera companies to offer a specific IP rating rather than a vague claim of "weather resistance." The other is Leica.

Like Fujifilm, there's a wide array of sensible lenses available you can pair with the OM-5 II, though Micro Four Thirds offers lighter and more compact options than even APS-C.

However, the OM-5 II misses out on some features that are quickly becoming table stakes, such as the ability to shoot 10-bit stills that use an HDR response curve, a 60p video mode, and a wider array of AI-derived subject detection modes for its autofocus system. At this point, there are cameras well under $1000 that have these features, so they feel like a notable absence.

Body and Handling

Like its predecessor, the OM-5 II is very light, while still managing to remain well-balanced when paired with larger lenses like OM System's 40-150mm F4 Pro. The extra grip helps in this regard, filling out your palm and making the camera feel more substantial without adding much weight or bulk.

The OM-5 II has a selection of buttons and levers, and as is tradition for the brand, most of them can be customized to do pretty much anything you'd like. While the buttons around the four-way controller are fixed, you're free to do what you wish with the buttons on the top plate, including the two semi-circular ones atop the power lever. The settings are separate for stills and video modes.

It also has OM System's customary function lever, which is unfortunately much more limited; it can only be used to power the camera on or off (leaving the dedicated power lever to do nothing), turn the camera into video mode, or to switch between a small subset of dial functions or autofocus settings. It does not recognize the eye recognition mode, so you can't use it to switch between, say, tracking autofocus and continuous autofocus with eye recognition – unlike many other cameras, you can't have both human detection and tracking on at once.

It also features a locking mode dial, with settings for all the major exposure modes, along with video, scene and art filter modes. Its two top-plate command dials have relatively aggressive knurling, making them easy to manipulate even while wearing gloves.

Despite the revised menus, one of the OM-5 II's best features remains its "Super Control Panel," which is mapped to the OK button by default. It lets you easily access and control most of the camera's main shooting settings on a single touchscreen panel: drive mode, AF mode, face and eye detection, exposure and ISO control, etc.

EVF and Monitor

The OM-5 II's viewfinder remains unchanged from the 2.36M dot 0.68x (equiv.) magnification model found on its predecessor. While it's relatively small, it usually gets the job done, and it's good to have in bright conditions where the fully articulating 3" LCD – also unchanged – will get washed out.

Battery The OM-5's tripod mount is somewhat controversial – OM Systems tells us it's unchanged for the II.

The OM-5 II uses the same 8.5Wh BLS-50 battery as its predecessor, which the company says will last for around 310 shots based on CIPA test standards. While you can generally expect to get more shots than the rated number in real-world use, it's a useful indicator for comparing across cameras. In this case, it's relatively low; if you're going into the wilderness for a weekend, you may want to pack a spare battery or plan on topping it up with your USB-C power bank.

Initial Impressions

By Mitchell Clark

Let me start by saying that, despite the harsh headline, I still think there are people who should consider the OM-5 II. It fills a niche of cameras that are rugged, small and light but that still pack features you'd have to pay more to get in larger-sensor cameras. The OM-5 II still does all that while including some modern comforts.

However, it's hard to ignore that it's a version II seemingly separated from its predecessor by a single port, a few millimeters of rubber, a red LED and a software update. It also doesn't help that OM System had most of these pieces before the OM-5 even launched – the OM-1 debuted with the new menu system and USB-C months before that camera hit the market. To put it bluntly, it feels like OM System should've released this camera three years ago.

Even if we ignore that and take the OM-5 II on its own terms, parts of it still feel last-gen. Autofocus is the main one: it's been a while since I've used a new camera whose AF points didn't go all the way to the edge of the sensor (though admittedly, they cover as much as most people will probably need), and that didn't have AI-derived subject recognition. Even in my brief time with it, it's made me work much harder to focus on and track animals and birds than cheaper cameras from Canon, Nikon and even Fujifilm. That feels like a miss for an adventure camera made for the outdoors.

But again, that doesn't necessarily mean there's still no place for the OM-5 II. Those other cameras don't have stabilized sensors, IP water and dust resistance ratings or the arsenal of multi-shot modes that OM System brings to the table. They also use lenses that are heavier and bulkier than the OM-5 II's; the most sophisticated autofocusing in the world doesn't do you any good if you leave your camera at home because you can't be bothered to carry it.

It's nice to see a follow-up that isn't more expensive than its predecessor

It's also nice to see a follow-up that isn't more expensive than its predecessor these days. But I can't help but feel like the camera deserves more attention than it got from the company – a few autofocus improvements here, some more work on the controls there, and it might have been a standard-bearer for OM System and Micro Four Thirds as a whole, like some of its predecessors.

We'll need to spend more time shooting with and testing the OM-5 II before we can really say how well it competes in today's market. It could wind up being more than the sum of its parts. But at first glance, these are some pretty familiar parts.

Sample Gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.

Sample galleryThis widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.